BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Chenguang Lu

Chenguang Lu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Information Theorymath.ITArtificial IntelligenceComputational ComplexityComputer Visioneess.SPMachine Learningmath.LO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Channels' Confirmation and Predictions' Confirmation: from the Medical Test to the Raven Paradox

After long arguments between positivism and falsificationism, the verification of universal hypotheses was replaced with the confirmation of uncertain major premises. Unfortunately, Hemple discovered the Raven Paradox (RP). Then, Carnap used the logical probability increment as the confirmation measure. So far, many confirmation measures have been proposed. Measure F among them proposed by Kemeny and Oppenheim possesses symmetries and asymmetries proposed by Elles and Fitelson, monotonicity proposed by Greco et al., and normalizing property suggested by many researchers. Based on the semantic information theory, a measure b* similar to F is derived from the medical test. Like the likelihood ratio, b* and F can only indicate the quality of channels or the testing means instead of the quality of probability predictions. And, it is still not easy to use b*, F, or another measure to clarify the RP. For this reason, measure c* similar to the correct rate is derived. The c* has the simple form: (a-c)/max(a, c); it supports the Nicod Criterion and undermines the Equivalence Condition, and hence, can be used to eliminate the RP. Some examples are provided to show why it is difficult to use one of popular confirmation measures to eliminate the RP. Measure F, b*, and c* indicate that fewer counterexamples' existence is more essential than more positive examples' existence, and hence, are compatible with Popper's falsification thought.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Downlink Fronthaul Compression in Frequency Domain using OpenAirInterface

This paper presents a compression scheme developed for the transport of downlink radio signals in packet fronthaul of centralized-radio access networks (C-RAN). The technique is tailored to frequency-domain functional splits, in which inactive LTE (or 5G NR) resource elements may not be transmitted in the packets. This allows decreasing the link data rate, especially when the cell load is low. The compression scheme is based on two parts: transmission of side information to indicate active and inactive resource elements of the LTE, and nonuniform scalar quantization to compress the QAM symbols of the active resource elements. The method was implemented in the OpenAirInterface (OAI) software for real-time evaluation. The testbed results show a significant reduction in link usage with a low computational cost.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fair Marriage Principle and Initialization Map for the EM Algorithm

The popular convergence theory of the EM algorithm explains that the observed incomplete data log-likelihood L and the complete data log-likelihood Q are positively correlated, and we can maximize L by maximizing Q. The Deterministic Annealing EM (DAEM) algorithm was hence proposed for avoiding locally maximal Q. This paper provides different conclusions: 1) The popular convergence theory is wrong; 2) The locally maximal Q can affect the convergent speed, but cannot block the global convergence; 3) Like marriage competition, unfair competition between two components may vastly decrease the globally convergent speed; 4) Local convergence exists because the sample is too small, and unfair competition exists; 5) An improved EM algorithm, called the Channel Matching (CM) EM algorithm, can accelerate the global convergence. This paper provides an initialization map with two means as two axes for the example of a binary Gaussian mixture studied by the authors of DAEM algorithm. This map can tell how fast the convergent speeds are for different initial means and why points in some areas are not suitable as initial points. A two-dimensional example indicates that the big sample or the fair initialization can avoid global convergence. For more complicated mixture models, we need further study to convert the fair marriage principle to specific methods for the initializations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

GPS Information and Rate Tolerance - Clarifying Relationship between Rate Distortion and Complexity Distortion

I proposed rate tolerance and discussed its relation to rate distortion in my book "A Generalized Information Theory" published in 1993. Recently, I examined the structure function and the complexity distortion based on Kolmogorov's complexity theory. It is my understanding now that complexity-distortion is only a special case of rate tolerance while constraint sets change from fuzzy sets into clear sets that look like balls with the same radius. It is not true that the complexity distortion is generally equivalent to rate distortion as claimed by the researchers of complexity theory. I conclude that a rate distortion function can only be equivalent to a rate tolerance function and both of them can be described by a generalized mutual information formula where P(Y|X) is equal to P(Y|Tolerance). The paper uses GPS as an example to derive generalized information formulae and proves the above conclusions using mathematical analyses and a coding example. The similarity between the formula for measuring GPS information and the formula for rate distortion function can deepen our understanding the generalized information measure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Illustrating Color Evolution and Color Blindness by the Decoding Model of Color Vision

A symmetrical model of color vision, the decoding model as a new version of zone model, was introduced. The model adopts new continuous-valued logic and works in a way very similar to the way a 3-8 decoder in a numerical circuit works. By the decoding model, Young and Helmholtz's tri-pigment theory and Hering's opponent theory are unified more naturally; opponent process, color evolution, and color blindness are illustrated more concisely. According to the decoding model, we can obtain a transform from RGB system to HSV system, which is formally identical to the popular transform for computer graphics provided by Smith (1978). Advantages, problems, and physiological tests of the decoding model are also discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access