Source author record

Charles W. Champ

Charles W. Champ appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Process, Population, and Sample: the Researcher's Interest

A case is made that researchers are interested in studying processes. Often the inferences they are interested in making are about the process and its associated population. On other occasions, a researcher may be interested in making an inference about the collection of individuals the process has generated. We will call the statistical methods employed by the researcher to make such inferences about the process/population ``estimation methods.'' The statistical methods used in making an inference about the collection of individuals generated we call ``prediction methods.'' Methods for obtaining interval estimates of a parameter and prediction intervals for a statistic are given. The analytical and enumerative methods discussed in Deming (1953) are simply estimation and prediction methods, respectively.

preprint2018arXiv

The exponential distribution analog of the Grubbs--Weaver method

Grubbs and Weaver (JASA 42 (1947) 224--241) suggest a minimum-variance unbiased estimator for the population standard deviation of a normal random variable, where a random sample is drawn and a weighted sum of the ranges of subsamples is calculated. The optimal choice involves using as many subsamples of size eight as possible. They verified their results numerically for samples of size up to 100, and conjectured that their "rule of eights" is valid for all sample sizes. Here we examine the analogous problem where the underlying distribution is exponential and find that a "rule of fours" yields optimality and prove the result rigorously.