Researcher profile

Charles L. Epstein

Charles L. Epstein contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Debye source representation for type-I superconductors, I

In this note, we analyze the classical magneto-static approach to the theory of type I superconductors, and a Debye source representation that can be used numerically to solve the resultant equations. We also prove that one of the fields, $\boldsymbol{J}^-$, found within the superconductor via the London equations, is the physical current in that the outgoing part of the magnetic field is given as the Biot-Savart integral of $\boldsymbol{J}^{-}$. Finally, we compute the static currents for moderate values of London penetration depth, $λ_L,$ for a sphere, a stellarator-like geometry and a two-holed torus.

preprint2020arXiv

Geometry of the Phase Retrieval Problem

One of the most powerful approaches to imaging at the nanometer or subnanometer length scale is coherent diffraction imaging using X-ray sources. For amorphous (non-crystalline) samples, the raw data can be interpreted as the modulus of the continuous Fourier transform of the unknown object. Making use of prior information about the sample (such as its support), a natural goal is to recover the phase through computational means, after which the unknown object can be visualized at high resolution. While many algorithms have been proposed for this phase retrieval problem, careful analysis of its well-posedness has received relatively little attention. In this paper, we show that the problem is, in general, not well-posed and describe some of the underlying issues that are responsible for the ill-posedness. We then show how this analysis can be used to develop experimental protocols that lead to better conditioned inverse problems.

preprint2020arXiv

Recovering missing data in coherent diffraction imaging

In coherent diffraction imaging (CDI) experiments, the intensity of the scattered wave impinging on an object is measured on an array of detectors. This signal can be interpreted as the square of the modulus of the Fourier transform of the unknown scattering density. A beam-stop obstructs the forward scattered wave and, hence, the modulus Fourier data from a neighborhood of k=0 cannot be measured. In this note, we describe a linear method for recovering this unmeasured modulus Fourier data from the measured values and an estimate of the support of the image's autocorrelation function without consideration of phase retrieval. We analyze the conditioning of this problem, which grows exponentially with the modulus of the maximum spatial frequency not measured, and the effects of noise.