BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Charles J. Colbourn

Charles J. Colbourn appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.CODiscrete MathematicsInformation Theorymath.ITData Structures and Algorithmsmath.GRNetworking and Internet ArchitectureSoftware Engineering

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Disjoint spread systems and fault location

When $k$ factors each taking one of $v$ levels may affect the correctness or performance of a complex system, a test is selected by setting each factor to one of its levels and determining whether the system functions as expected (passes the test) or not (fails). In our setting, each test failure can be attributed to at least one faulty (factor, level) pair. A nonadaptive test suite is a selection of such tests to be executed in parallel. One goal is to minimize the number of tests in a test suite from which we can determine which (factor, level) pairs are faulty, if any. In this paper, we determine the number of tests needed to locate faults when exactly one (or at most one) pair is faulty. To do this, we address an equivalent problem, to determine how many set partitions of a set of size $N$ exist in which each partition contains $v$ classes and no two classes in the partitions are equal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Distributing hash families with few rows

Column replacement techniques for creating covering arrays rely on the construction of perfect and distributing hash families with few rows, having as many columns as possible for a specified number of symbols. To construct distributing hash families in which the number of rows is less than the strength, we examine a method due to Blackburn and extend it in three ways. First, the method is generalized from homogeneous hash families (in which every row has the same number of symbols) to heterogeneous ones. Second, the extension treats distributing hash families, in which only separation into a prescribed number of parts is required, rather than perfect hash families, in which columns must be completely separated. Third, the requirements on one of the main ingredients are relaxed to permit the use of a large class of distributing hash families, which we call fractal. Constructions for fractal perfect and distributing hash families are given, and applications to the construction of perfect hash families of large strength are developed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Partial Covering Arrays: Algorithms and Asymptotics

A covering array $\mathsf{CA}(N;t,k,v)$ is an $N\times k$ array with entries in $\{1, 2, \ldots , v\}$, for which every $N\times t$ subarray contains each $t$-tuple of $\{1, 2, \ldots , v\}^t$ among its rows. Covering arrays find application in interaction testing, including software and hardware testing, advanced materials development, and biological systems. A central question is to determine or bound $\mathsf{CAN}(t,k,v)$, the minimum number $N$ of rows of a $\mathsf{CA}(N;t,k,v)$. The well known bound $\mathsf{CAN}(t,k,v)=O((t-1)v^t\log k)$ is not too far from being asymptotically optimal. Sensible relaxations of the covering requirement arise when (1) the set $\{1, 2, \ldots , v\}^t$ need only be contained among the rows of at least $(1-ε)\binom{k}{t}$ of the $N\times t$ subarrays and (2) the rows of every $N\times t$ subarray need only contain a (large) subset of $\{1, 2, \ldots , v\}^t$. In this paper, using probabilistic methods, significant improvements on the covering array upper bound are established for both relaxations, and for the conjunction of the two. In each case, a randomized algorithm constructs such arrays in expected polynomial time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Two-stage algorithms for covering array construction

Modern software systems often consist of many different components, each with a number of options. Although unit tests may reveal faulty options for individual components, functionally correct components may interact in unforeseen ways to cause a fault. Covering arrays are used to test for interactions among components systematically. A two-stage framework, providing a number of concrete algorithms, is developed for the efficient construction of covering arrays. %Our framework divides the construction in two stages. In the first stage, a time and memory efficient randomized algorithm covers most of the interactions. In the second stage, a more sophisticated search covers the remainder in relatively few tests. In this way, the storage limitations of the sophisticated search algorithms are avoided; hence the range of the number of components for which the algorithm can be applied is extended, without increasing the number of tests. Many of the framework instantiations can be tuned to optimize a memory-quality trade-off, so that fewer tests can be achieved using more memory. The algorithms developed outperform the currently best known methods when the number of components ranges from 20 to 60, the number of options for each ranges from 3 to 6, and $t$-way interactions are covered for $t\in \{5,6\}$. In some cases a reduction in the number of tests by more than $50\%$ is achieved.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Upper bounds on the size of covering arrays

Covering arrays find important application in software and hardware interaction testing. For practical applications it is useful to determine or bound the minimum number of rows, CAN$(t,k,v)$, in a covering array for given values of the parameters $t,k$ and $v$. Asymptotic upper bounds for CAN$(t,k,v)$ have earlier been established using the Stein-Lovász-Johnson strategy and the Lovász local lemma. A series of improvements on these bounds is developed in this paper. First an estimate for the discrete Stein-Lovász-Johnson bound is derived. Then using alteration, the Stein-Lovász-Johnson bound is improved upon, leading to a two-stage construction algorithm. Bounds from the Lovász local lemma are improved upon in a different manner, by examining group actions on the set of symbols. Two asymptotic upper bounds on CAN$(t,k,v)$ are established that are tighter than the known bounds. A two-stage bound is derived that employs the Lovász local lemma and the conditional Lovász local lemma distribution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A combinatorial approach to X-tolerant compaction circuits

Test response compaction for integrated circuits (ICs) with scan-based design-for-testability (DFT) support in the presence of unknown logic values (Xs) is investigated from a combinatorial viewpoint. The theoretical foundations of X-codes, employed in an X-tolerant compaction technique called X-compact, are examined. Through the formulation of a combinatorial model of X-compact, novel design techniques are developed for X-codes to detect a specified maximum number of errors in the presence of a specified maximum number of unknown logic values, while requiring only small fan-out. The special class of X-codes that results leads to an avoidance problem for configurations in combinatorial designs. General design methods and nonconstructive existence theorems to estimate the compaction ratio of an optimal X-compactor are also derived.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Steiner Loops Satisfying the Statement of Moufang's Theorem

Andrew Rajah posed at the Loops'11 Conference in Trest, Czech Republic, the following conjecture: Is every variety of loops that satisfies Moufang's theorem contained in the variety of Moufang loops? This paper is motivated by that problem. We give a partial answer to this question and present two types of Steiner loops, one that satisfies Moufang's theorem and another that does not, and neither is Moufang loop.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Hierarchical Recovery in Compressive Sensing

A combinatorial approach to compressive sensing based on a deterministic column replacement technique is proposed. Informally, it takes as input a pattern matrix and ingredient measurement matrices, and results in a larger measurement matrix by replacing elements of the pattern matrix with columns from the ingredient matrices. This hierarchical technique yields great flexibility in sparse signal recovery. Specifically, recovery for the resulting measurement matrix does not depend on any fixed algorithm but rather on the recovery scheme of each ingredient matrix. In this paper, we investigate certain trade-offs for signal recovery, considering the computational investment required. Coping with noise in signal recovery requires additional conditions, both on the pattern matrix and on the ingredient measurement matrices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

ATLAS: Adaptive Topology- and Load-Aware Scheduling

The largest strength of contention-based MAC protocols is simultaneously the largest weakness of their scheduled counterparts: the ability to adapt to changes in network conditions. For scheduling to be competitive in mobile wireless networks, continuous adaptation must be addressed. We propose ATLAS, an Adaptive Topology- and Load-Aware Scheduling protocol to address this problem. In ATLAS, each node employs a random schedule achieving its persistence, the fraction of time a node is permitted to transmit, that is computed in a topology and load dependent manner. A distributed auction (REACT) piggybacks offers and claims onto existing network traffic to compute a lexicographic max-min channel allocation. A node's persistence p is related to its allocation. Its schedule achieving p is updated where and when needed, without waiting for a frame boundary.We study how ATLAS adapts to controlled changes in topology and load. Our results show that ATLAS adapts to most network changes in less than 0.1s, with about 20% relative error, scaling with network size. We further study ATLAS in more dynamic networks showing that it keeps up with changes in topology and load sufficient for TCP to sustain multi-hop flows, a struggle in IEEE 802.11 networks. The stable performance of ATLAS supports the design of higher-layer services that inform, and are informed by, the underlying communication network.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access