BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Chaoqun Liu

Chaoqun Liu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.flu-dyn

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

A Relative Liutex Method for Vortex Identification

A relative Liutex vortex identification method is proposed in this study, together with its explicit mathematical formulation. The method is designed to identify vortical structures based solely on local flow-field information and is inherently Galilean invariant, ensuring robustness under different reference frames. To validate the proposed approach, a three-dimensional flat-plate boundary-layer transition case is investigated, in which the relative Liutex is systematically compared with conventional vortex identification methods, including the Q-criterion and the original Liutex method. The results show that the relative Liutex is capable of simultaneously capturing both strong and weak vortical structures. Importantly, its behavior cannot be interpreted as a simple superposition of Liutex iso-surfaces obtained using different threshold values. Instead, the relative Liutex provides a more selective and physically coherent identification of weak vortices, particularly in regions above the $Λ$-vortex and in the downstream hairpin-vortex structures, while effectively suppressing spurious and noise-induced features. These advantages arise from its formulation based on local velocity-gradient strength rather than a global vortical-intensity measure. Owing to its ability to consistently identify vortices across a wide range of intensities, the relative Liutex demonstrates strong potential for revealing complex vortex structures and underlying flow mechanisms in vortex-dominated flows.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

An objective vortex identification method

Generally, the vortex structures should be independent of the observers who are moving, especially when their coordinates are non-inertial, which may result in confusions in communications between researchers. The property that not being influenced by the choice of coordinate is called objective. Mostly, researchers would like to gather data in the inertial coordinate because most physical laws are valid in the inertial coordinate. As a result, how to transfer the observations in a non-inertial coordinate to those in an inertial coordinate raises interest. In this paper, methods are provided to obtain velocity and velocity gradient tensor in an inertial coordinate from the non-inertial observations based on one known zero-vorticity point which can be chosen from physical fact such as the point is located in the inviscid region.Further, objective vortex structure can be calculated from the objective velocity or velocity gradient tensor. With Liutex chosen as the indicator of the vortex, two numerical examples are used to test the proposed methods. The results show that the methods perform very well and the relative error is extremely small.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Correlation Analysis among Vorticity, Q method and Liutex

Influenced by the fact that vorticity represents rotation for rigid body, people believe it also works for fluid flow. However, the theoretical predictions by vorticity do not match experiment results, which drove scientists to look for better methods to describe vortex. According to Dr. Liu classification, all methods applied to detect vortex can be categorized into three generations. The vorticity-based method is classified as the first generation. Methods relying on eigenvalues of velocity gradient tensor are considered as the second generation. Although so many methods appeared, people still believe vorticity is vortex since vorticity theory looks perfect in math, and all other methods are only scalars and unable to indicate swirl direction. Recently, Dr. Liu innovated a new vortex identification method called Liutex. Liutex, a vector quantity, which is regarded as the third-generation method, not only overcomes all previous methods drawbacks, but also has a clear physical meaning. The direction of Liutex represents the swirl axis of rotation, and its strength is equal to twice of angular speed. In this paper, we did a correlation analysis between vorticity, Q, Lambda ci, Lambda 2 methods and Liutex based on a DNS case of boundary layer transition. The results show that the correlation between vorticity and Liutex is minimal in strong shear region, which demonstrates the idea that using vorticity to detect vortex lacks a scientific foundation; in other words, vorticity is not vortex.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Liutex-based Modified Navier-Stokes Equation

The Navier-Stokes (NS) partial differential equations, as the governing equation of fluid dynamics, are based on particles with zero volume. In such a condition, conservation law of moment of momentum is automatically satisfied, and thus NS equations only contain conservation of mass, momentum and energy. Because of the difficulty to get an analytical solution of NS equations, scientists develop finite element method (FEM) and finite volume method (FVM) to obtain approximate solutions. However, these methods are dependent on the size of finite volumes, which is not zero. Considering the size of the finite volume, conservation law of moment of momentum is no longer automatically satisfied and it is necessary to develop a new control equation to take effect of momentum into account. In this paper, new relations of reciprocal shear stresses are derived from conservation law of moment of momentum, and so are new constitutive relations and modified NS equations. The Liutex based NS equation may be the universal governing equations for both laminar and turbulent flow which is dominated by vortices and conservation of moment of momentum must be satisfied.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stretching and Shearing Contamination Analysis for Liutex/Rortex and Other Vortex Identification Methods

Although traditional vortex identification methods such as Q, Delta, Lambda2, Lambdaci remain popular in the identification and visualization of vortices, these methods count on shearing and stretching as a part of vortex strength. However, shearing and stretching do not contribute to fluid rotation. In this paper, the contamination effects of stretching and shearing of these methods are investigated and compared with Liutex method. From our investigation, the Liutex is an exact definition of fluid rotation or vortex, while other vortex identification methods are contaminated by stretching and shearing at different levels. The decomposition of the velocity gradient tensor can only be conducted in a so-called Principal Coordinate for uniqueness. The mathematical relation between Liutex and other vortex identification function are derived in this paper and then the effects of shearing and stretching on different vortex identification methods are studied. The mathematical formula and computation of the stretching and shearing effects on different schemes clearly show that the Liutex method has superiority over the other vortex identification methods as it only counts on local fluid rigid rotation while other methods count on stretching/compression and shearing as a part of the fluid rotation or vortex.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access