Source author record

Chao-Kai Chiang

Chao-Kai Chiang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Embracing Biased Transition Matrices for Complementary-Label Learning with Many Classes

Complementary-label learning (CLL) is a weakly supervised paradigm where instances are labeled with classes they do not belong to. Despite a decade of research, CLL methods remain competitive mainly on 10-class classification, with scaling to large label spaces continuing to be an enduring bottleneck. This limitation stems from the common assumption of uniform label generation in traditional methods, which fatally dilutes the learning signal in many-class settings. In this paper, we demonstrate that this long-standing barrier can be overcome by deliberately designing a biased (non-uniform) generation process that restricts complementary labels to a subset of classes. This finding motivates us to propose Bias-Induced Constrained Labeling (BICL), a principled framework spanning data collection to training that leverages this bias. BICL enables effective learning on CIFAR-100 and TinyImageNet-200, achieving more than sevenfold accuracy improvements over traditional methods. Our findings establish a new trajectory for making CLL feasible for many classes in real-world applications.

preprint2016arXiv

An algorithm with nearly optimal pseudo-regret for both stochastic and adversarial bandits

We present an algorithm that achieves almost optimal pseudo-regret bounds against adversarial and stochastic bandits. Against adversarial bandits the pseudo-regret is $O(K\sqrt{n \log n})$ and against stochastic bandits the pseudo-regret is $O(\sum_i (\log n)/Δ_i)$. We also show that no algorithm with $O(\log n)$ pseudo-regret against stochastic bandits can achieve $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ expected regret against adaptive adversarial bandits. This complements previous results of Bubeck and Slivkins (2012) that show $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ expected adversarial regret with $O((\log n)^2)$ stochastic pseudo-regret.