Source author record

Chanseok Park

Chanseok Park appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Empirical distributions of the robustified $t$-test statistics

Based on the median and the median absolute deviation estimators, and the Hodges-Lehmann and Shamos estimators, robustified analogues of the conventional $t$-test statistic are proposed. The asymptotic distributions of these statistics are recently provided. However, when the sample size is small, it is not appropriate to use the asymptotic distribution of the robustified $t$-test statistics for making a statistical inference including hypothesis testing, confidence interval, p-value, etc. In this article, through extensive Monte Carlo simulations, we obtain the empirical distributions of the robustified $t$-test statistics and their quantile values. Then these quantile values can be used for making a statistical inference.

preprint2021arXiv

A note on the g and h control charts

In this note, we revisit the $g$ and $h$ control charts that are commonly used for monitoring the number of conforming cases between the two consecutive appearances of nonconformities. It is known that the process parameter of these charts is usually unknown and estimated by using the maximum likelihood estimator and the minimum variance unbiased estimator. However, the minimum variance unbiased estimator in the control charts has been inappropriately used in the quality engineering literature. This observation motivates us to provide the correct minimum variance unbiased estimator and investigate theoretical and empirical biases of these estimators under consideration. Given that these charts are developed based on the underlying assumption that samples from the process should be balanced, which is often not satisfied in many practical applications, we propose a method for constructing these charts with unbalanced samples.

preprint2020arXiv

Investigation of finite-sample properties of robust location and scale estimators

When the experimental data set is contaminated, we usually employ robust alternatives to common location and scale estimators such as the sample median and Hodges-Lehmann estimators for location and the sample median absolute deviation and Shamos estimators for scale. It is well known that these estimators have high positive asymptotic breakdown points and are Fisher-consistent as the sample size tends to infinity. To the best of our knowledge, the finite-sample properties of these estimators, depending on the sample size, have not well been studied in the literature. In this paper, we fill this gap by providing their closed-form finite-sample breakdown points and calculating the unbiasing factors and relative efficiencies of the robust estimators through the extensive Monte Carlo simulations up to the sample size 100. The numerical study shows that the unbiasing factor improves the finite-sample performance significantly. In addition, we provide the predicted values for the unbiasing factors obtained by using the least squares method which can be used for the case of sample size more than 100.

preprint2012arXiv

A Note On the Use of Fiducial Limits for Control Charts

Many of the early works in the quality control literature construct control limits through the use of graphs and tables as described in Wortham and Ringer (1972). However, the methods used in this literature are restricted to using only the values that the graphs and tables can provide and to the case where the parameters of the underlying distribution are known. In this note, we briefly describe a technique which can be used to calculate exact control limits without the use of graphs or tables. We also describe what are commonly referred to in the literature as fiducial limits. Fiducial limits are often used as the limits in control charting when the parameters of the underlying distribution are unknown.

preprint2012arXiv

Determination of the Joint Confidence Region of Optimal Operating Conditions in Robust Design by Bootstrap Technique

Robust design has been widely recognized as a leading method in reducing variability and improving quality. Most of the engineering statistics literature mainly focuses on finding "point estimates" of the optimum operating conditions for robust design. Various procedures for calculating point estimates of the optimum operating conditions are considered. Although this point estimation procedure is important for continuous quality improvement, the immediate question is "how accurate are these optimum operating conditions?" The answer for this is to consider interval estimation for a single variable or joint confidence regions for multiple variables. In this paper, with the help of the bootstrap technique, we develop procedures for obtaining joint "confidence regions" for the optimum operating conditions. Two different procedures using Bonferroni and multivariate normal approximation are introduced. The proposed methods are illustrated and substantiated using a numerical example.

preprint2012arXiv

Parameter Estimation from Censored Samples using the Expectation-Maximization Algorithm

This paper deals with parameter estimation when the data are randomly right censored. The maximum likelihood estimates from censored samples are obtained by using the expectation-maximization (EM) and Monte Carlo EM (MCEM) algorithms. We introduce the concept of the EM and MCEM algorithms and develop parameter estimation methods for a variety of distributions such as normal, Laplace and Rayleigh distributions. These proposed methods are illustrated with three examples.