BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Chalongrat Daengngam

Chalongrat Daengngam appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
eess.SPMachine Learningphysics.chem-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

A review of artificial intelligence methods combined with Raman spectroscopy to identify the composition of substances

In general, most of the substances in nature exist in mixtures, and the noninvasive identification of mixture composition with high speed and accuracy remains a difficult task. However, the development of Raman spectroscopy, machine learning, and deep learning techniques have paved the way for achieving efficient analytical tools capable of identifying mixture components, making an apparent breakthrough in the identification of mixtures beyond the traditional chemical analysis methods. This article summarizes the work of Raman spectroscopy in identifying the composition of substances as well as provides detailed reviews on the preprocessing process of Raman spectroscopy, the analysis methods and applications of artificial intelligence. This review summarizes the work of Raman spectroscopy in identifying the composition of substances and reviews the preprocessing process of Raman spectroscopy, the analysis methods and applications of artificial intelligence. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages and development prospects of Raman spectroscopy are discussed in detail.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Method for classifying a noisy Raman spectrum based on a wavelet transform and a deep neural network

This paper proposes a new framework based on a wavelet transform and deep neural network for identifying noisy Raman spectrum since, in practice, it is relatively difficult to classify the spectrum under baseline noise and additive white Gaussian noise environments. The framework consists of two main engines. Wavelet transform is proposed as the framework front-end for transforming 1-D noise Raman spectrum to two-dimensional data. This two-dimensional data will be fed to the framework back-end which is a classifier. The optimum classifier is chosen by implementing several traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, and then we investigated their classification accuracy and robustness performances. The four MLs we choose included a Naive Bayes (NB), a Support Vector Machine (SVM), a Random Forest (RF) and a K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) where a deep convolution neural network (DCNN) was chosen for a DL classifier. Noise-free, Gaussian noise, baseline noise, and mixed-noise Raman spectrums were applied to train and validate the ML and DCNN models. The optimum back-end classifier was obtained by testing the ML and DCNN models with several noisy Raman spectrums (10-30 dB noise power). Based on the simulation, the accuracy of the DCNN classifier is 9% higher than the NB classifier, 3.5% higher than the RF classifier, 1% higher than the KNN classifier, and 0.5% higher than the SVM classifier. In terms of robustness to the mixed noise scenarios, the framework with DCNN back-end showed superior performance than the other ML back-ends. The DCNN back-end achieved 90% accuracy at 3 dB SNR while NB, SVM, RF, and K-NN back-ends required 27 dB, 22 dB, 27 dB, and 23 dB SNR, respectively. In addition, in the low-noise test data set, the F-measure score of the DCNN back-end exceeded 99.1% while the F-measure scores of the other ML engines were below 98.7%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Noise Reduction Technique for Raman Spectrum using Deep Learning Network

In a normal indoor environment, Raman spectrum encounters noise often conceal spectrum peak, leading to difficulty in spectrum interpretation. This paper proposes deep learning (DL) based noise reduction technique for Raman spectroscopy. The proposed DL network is developed with several training and test sets of noisy Raman spectrum. The proposed technique is applied to denoise and compare the performance with different wavelet noise reduction methods. Output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), root-mean-square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) are the performance evaluation index. It is shown that output SNR of the proposed noise reduction technology is 10.24 dB greater than that of the wavelet noise reduction method while the RMSE and the MAPE are 292.63 and 10.09, which are much better than the proposed technique.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access