Researcher profile

Cesar Ayala

Cesar Ayala contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Determination of $α(M_z)$ from an hyperasymptotic approximation to the energy of a static quark-antiquark pair

We give the hyperasymptotic expansion of the energy of a static quark-antiquark pair with a precision that includes the effects of the subleading renormalon. The terminants associated to the first and second renormalon are incorporated in the analysis when necessary. In particular, we determine the normalization of the leading renormalon of the force and, consequently, of the subleading renormalon of the static potential. We obtain $Z_3^F(n_f=3)=2Z_3^V(n_f=3)=0.37(17)$. The precision we reach in strict perturbation theory is next-to-next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic resummed order both for the static potential and for the force. We find that the resummation of large logarithms and the inclusion of the leading terminants associated to the renormalons are compulsory to get accurate determinations of $Λ_{\overline{\rm MS}}$ when fitting to short-distance lattice data of the static energy. We obtain $Λ_{\overline{\rm MS}}^{(n_f=3)}=338(12)$ MeV and $α(M_z)=0.1181(9)$. We have also found strong consistency checks that the ultrasoft correction to the static energy can be computed at weak coupling in the energy range we have studied.

preprint2020arXiv

Evaluation of neutrinoless double beta decay: QCD running to sub-GeV scales

We evaluate QCD effects in the neutrinoless double beta ($0νββ$) decay, originating from new physics short-range mechanism in the form of five dimension-9 operators. For this, we employ the one-loop and two-loop renormalization group equations (RGEs) for the corresponding Wilson coefficients, performing the RGE-evolution from the new physics scales (estimated as $Λ~ \sim 10^2$ GeV) to the typical spacelike $0νββ$-scale $Q \sim 0.1$ GeV. Since the latter scale is clearly nonperturbative, we apply various infrared-safe (IR-safe) variants of QCD where the running coupling has no Landau singularities at low spacelike $Q$. We point out that the correct treatment of the IR-safe analogs of the (noninteger) powers of the couplings is important. It turns out that in most cases of the considered operators the resulting QCD effects can be significant in this process, i.e., can be stronger than the effects of the present uncertainties in the nuclear matrix elements.

preprint2020arXiv

Hyperasymptotic approximation to the top, bottom and charm pole mass

We construct hyperasymptotic expansions for the heavy quark pole mass regulated using the principal value (PV) prescription. We apply such hyperasymptotic expansions to the $B/D$ meson masses, and $\bar Λ$ computed in the lattice. The issue of the uncertainty of the (top) pole mass is critically reexamined. The present theoretical uncertainty in the relation between ${\bar m}_t$, the $\bar{\rm MS}$ top mass, and $m_{t, \rm PV}$, the top pole mass regulated using the PV prescription, is numerically assessed to be $δm_{t,\rm PV}= 28\;{\rm MeV}$ for ${\bar m}_t =163$ GeV.

preprint2015arXiv

anQCD: a Mathematica package for calculations in general analytic QCD models

We provide a Mathematica package that evaluates the QCD analytic couplings (in the Euclidean domain) $\mathcal{A}_ν(Q^2)$, which are analytic analogs of the powers $a(Q^2)^ν$ of the underlying perturbative QCD (pQCD) coupling $a(Q^2) \equiv α_s(Q^2)/π$, in three analytic QCD models (anQCD): Fractional Analytic Perturbation Theory (FAPT), Two-delta analytic QCD (2$δ$anQCD), and Massive Perturbation Theory (MPT). The analytic (holomorphic) running couplings $\mathcal{A}_ν(Q^2)$, in contrast to the corresponding pQCD expressions $a(Q^2)^ν$, reflect correctly the analytic properties of the spacelike observables ${\cal D}(Q^2)$ in the complex $Q^2$ plane as dictated by the general principles of quantum field theory. They are thus more suited for evaluations of such physical quantities, especially at low momenta $|Q^2| \sim 1 \ {\rm GeV}^2$.

preprint2015arXiv

How to perform QCD analysis of DIS in Analytic Perturbation Theory

We apply (Fractional) Analytic Perturbation Theory (FAPT) to the QCD analysis of the nonsinglet nucleon structure function $F_2(x,Q^2)$ in deep inelastic scattering up to the next leading order and compare the results with ones obtained within the standard perturbation QCD. Based on a popular parameterization of the corresponding parton distribution we perform the analysis within the Jacobi Polynomial formalism and under the control of the numerical inverse Mellin transform. To reveal the main features of the FAPT two-loop approach, we consider a wide range of momentum transfer from high $Q^2\sim 100 {\rm GeV}^2$ to low $Q^2\sim 0.3 {\rm GeV}^2$ where the approach still works.

preprint2014arXiv

Gluon Propagator in Fractional Analytic Perturbation Theory

We consider the gluon propagator in the Landau gauge at low spacelike momenta and with the dressing function $Z(Q^2)$ at the two-loop order. We incorporate the nonperturbative effects by making the (noninteger) powers of the QCD coupling in the dressing function $Z(Q^2)$ analytic (holomorphic) via the Fractional Analytic Perturbation Theory (FAPT) model, and simultaneously introducing the gluon dynamical mass in the propagator as motivated by the previous analyses of the Dyson-Schwinger equations. The obtained propagator has behavior compatible with the unquenched lattice data ($N_f=2+1$) at low spacelike momenta $0.4 \ {\rm GeV} < Q \lesssim 10$ GeV. We conclude that the removal of the unphysical Landau singularities of the powers of the coupling via the (F)APT prescription, in conjunction with the introduction of the dynamical mass $M \approx 0.62$ GeV of the gluon, leads to an acceptable behavior of the propagator in the infrared regime.

preprint2014arXiv

Mathematica and Fortran programs for various analytic QCD couplings

We outline here the motivation for the existence of analytic QCD models, i.e., QCD frameworks in which the running coupling $A(Q^2)$ has no Landau singularities. The analytic (holomorphic) coupling $A(Q^2)$ is the analog of the underlying pQCD coupling $a(Q^2) \equiv α_s(Q^2)/π$, and any such $A(Q^2)$ defines an analytic QCD model. We present the general construction procedure for the couplings $A_ν(Q^2)$ which are analytic analogs of the powers $a(Q^2)^ν$. Three analytic QCD models are presented. Applications of our program (in Mathematica) for calculation of $A_ν(Q^2)$ in such models are presented. Programs in both Mathematica and Fortran can be downloaded from the web page: gcvetic.usm.cl.

preprint2014arXiv

The bottom quark mass from the $Υ(1S)$ system at NNNLO

We obtain an improved determination of the normalization constant of the first infrared renormalon of the pole mass (and the singlet static potential). For $N_f=3$ it reads $N_m=0.563(26)$. Charm quark effects in the bottom quark mass determination are carefully investigated. Finally, we determine the bottom quark mass using the NNNLO perturbative expression for the $Υ(1S)$ mass. We work in the renormalon subtracted scheme, which allows us to control the divergence of the perturbation series due to pole mass renormalon. Our result for the ${\overline {\rm MS}}$ mass reads ${\overline m}_{b}({\overline m}_{b})=4201(43)$ MeV.