Source author record

Céline Vial

Céline Vial appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.ST Statistics Theory math.PR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Spatial risk measure for gaussian processes

In this paper, we study the quantitative behavior of a spatial risk measure corresponding to a damage function and a region, taking into account the spatial dependence of the underlying process. This kind of risk measure has already been introduced and studied for some max-stable processes in [Koch2015]. In this paper, we consider isotropic Gaussian processes and the excess damage function over a threshold. We performed a simulation study and a real data study.

preprint2014arXiv

Global smoothness estimation of a Gaussian process from regular sequence designs

We consider a real Gaussian process $X$ having a global unknown smoothness $(r_{\scriptscriptstyle 0},β_{\scriptscriptstyle 0})$, $r_{\scriptscriptstyle 0}\in \mathds{N}_0$ and $β_{\scriptscriptstyle 0} \in]0,1[$, with $X^{(r_{\scriptscriptstyle 0})}$ (the mean-square derivative of $X$ if $r_{\scriptscriptstyle 0}\ge 1$) supposed to be locally stationary with index $β_{\scriptscriptstyle 0}$. From the behavior of quadratic variations built on divided differences of $X$, we derive an estimator of $(r_{\scriptscriptstyle 0},β_{\scriptscriptstyle 0})$ based on - not necessarily equally spaced - observations of $X$. Various numerical studies of these estimators exhibit their properties for finite sample size and different types of processes, and are also completed by two examples of application to real data.

preprint2006arXiv

Assessing extrema of empirical principal component functions

The difficulties of estimating and representing the distributions of functional data mean that principal component methods play a substantially greater role in functional data analysis than in more conventional finite-dimensional settings. Local maxima and minima in principal component functions are of direct importance; they indicate places in the domain of a random function where influence on the function value tends to be relatively strong but of opposite sign. We explore statistical properties of the relationship between extrema of empirical principal component functions, and their counterparts for the true principal component functions. It is shown that empirical principal component funcions have relatively little trouble capturing conventional extrema, but can experience difficulty distinguishing a ``shoulder'' in a curve from a small bump. For example, when the true principal component function has a shoulder, the probability that the empirical principal component function has instead a bump is approximately equal to 1/2. We suggest and describe the performance of bootstrap methods for assessing the strength of extrema. It is shown that the subsample bootstrap is more effective than the standard bootstrap in this regard. A ``bootstrap likelihood'' is proposed for measuring extremum strength. Exploratory numerical methods are suggested.