Source author record

Céline Helbert

Céline Helbert appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Gradient-based Active Learning with Gaussian Processes for Global Sensitivity Analysis

Global sensitivity analysis of complex numerical simulators is often limited by the small number of model evaluations that can be afforded. In such settings, surrogate models built from a limited set of simulations can substantially reduce the computational burden, provided that the design of computer experiments is enriched efficiently. In this context, we propose an active learning approach that, for a fixed evaluation budget, targets the most informative regions of the input space to improve sensitivity analysis accuracy. More specifically, our method builds on recent advances in active learning for sensitivity analysis (Sobol' indices and derivative-based global sensitivity measures, DGSM) that exploit derivatives obtained from a Gaussian process (GP) surrogate. By leveraging the joint posterior distribution of the GP gradient, we develop acquisition functions that better account for correlations between partial derivatives and their impact on the response surface, leading to a more comprehensive and robust methodology than existing DGSM-oriented criteria. The proposed approach is first compared to state-of-the-art methods on standard benchmark functions, and is then applied to a real environmental model of pesticide transfers.

preprint2026arXiv

Multiobjective Optimization under Uncertainties using Conditional Pareto Fronts

In this work, we propose a novel method to tackle the problem of multiobjective optimization under parameteric uncertainties, by considering the Conditional Pareto Sets and Conditional Pareto Fronts. Based on those quantities we can define the probability of coverage of the Conditional Pareto Set which can be interpreted as the probability for a design to be optimal in the Pareto sense. Due to the computational cost of such an approach, we introduce an Active Learning method based on Gaussian Process Regression in order to improve the estimation of this probability, which relies on a reformulation of the EHVI. We illustrate those methods on a few toy problems of moderate dimension, and on the problem of designing a cabin to highlight the differences in solutions brought by different formulations of the problem.

preprint2022arXiv

Coupling and selecting constraints in Bayesian optimization under uncertainties

We consider chance constrained optimization where it is sought to optimize a function while complying with constraints, both of which are affected by uncertainties. The high computational cost of realistic simulations strongly limits the number of evaluations and makes this type of problems particularly challenging. In such a context, it is common to rely on Bayesian optimization algorithms. Assuming, without loss of generality, that the uncertainty comes from some of the inputs, it becomes possible to build a Gaussian process model in the joint space of design and uncertain variables. A two-step acquisition function is then used to provide, both, promising optimization variables associated to relevant uncertain samples. Our overall contribution is to correlate the constraints in the GP model and exploit this to optimally decide, at each iteration, which constraint should be evaluated and at which point. The coupled Gaussian model of the constraints relies on an output-as-input encoding. The constraint selection idea is developed by enabling that each constraint can be evaluated for a different uncertain input, thus improving the refinement efficiency. Constraints coupling and selection are gradually implement in 3 algorithm variants which are compared to a reference Bayesian approach. The results are promising in terms of convergence speed, accuracy and stability as observed on a 2, a 4 and a 27-dimensional problems.