BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Cédric Herzet

Cédric Herzet contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Information TheoryMachine Learningmath.ITComputationCryptography and Securityeess.SPmath.OCphysics.data-an

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Beyond GAP screening for Lasso by exploiting new dual cutting half-spaces with supplementary material

In this paper, we propose a novel safe screening test for Lasso. Our procedure is based on a safe region with a dome geometry and exploits a canonical representation of the set of half-spaces (referred to as "dual cutting half-spaces" in this paper) containing the dual feasible set. The proposed safe region is shown to be always included in the state-of-the-art "GAP Sphere" and "GAP Dome" proposed by Fercoq et al. (and strictly so under very mild conditions) while involving the same computational burden. Numerical experiments confirm that our new dome enables to devise more powerful screening tests than GAP regions and lead to significant acceleration to solve Lasso.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Node-screening tests for L0-penalized least-squares problem with supplementary material

We present a novel screening methodology to safely discard irrelevant nodes within a generic branch-and-bound (BnB) algorithm solving the l0-penalized least-squares problem. Our contribution is a set of two simple tests to detect sets of feasible vectors that cannot yield optimal solutions. This allows to prune nodes of the BnB search tree, thus reducing the overall optimization time. One cornerstone of our contribution is a nesting property between tests at different nodes that allows to implement them with a low computational cost. Our work leverages the concept of safe screening, well known for sparsity-inducing convex problems, and some recent advances in this field for l0-penalized regression problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Screen & Relax: Accelerating the resolution of Elastic-net by safe identification of the solution support

In this paper, we propose a procedure to accelerate the resolution of the well-known "Elastic-Net" problem. Our procedure is based on the (partial) identification of the solution support and the reformulation of the original problem into a problem of reduced dimension. The identification of the support leverages the novel concept of "safe relaxing" where one aims to identify non-zero coefficients of the solution. It can be viewed as a dual approach to "safe screening" introduced in the last decade and allowing to reduce the problem dimension using the identification of zero coefficients of the solution. We show numerically that combining both methodologies in a "Screen & Relax" strategy enables to significantly improve the tradeoff between complexity and accuracy achievable by standard resolution techniques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Safe squeezing for antisparse coding

Spreading the information over all coefficients of a representation is a desirable property in many applications such as digital communication or machine learning. This so-called antisparse representation can be obtained by solving a convex program involving an $\ell_\infty$-norm penalty combined with a quadratic discrepancy. In this paper, we propose a new methodology, dubbed safe squeezing, to accelerate the computation of antisparse representation. We describe a test that allows to detect saturated entries in the solution of the optimization problem. The contribution of these entries is compacted into a single vector, thus operating a form of dimensionality reduction. We propose two algorithms to solve the resulting lower dimensional problem. Numerical experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed method to detect the saturated components of the solution and illustrates the induced computational gains in the resolution of the antisparse problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Bayesian Pursuit Algorithms

This paper addresses the sparse representation (SR) problem within a general Bayesian framework. We show that the Lagrangian formulation of the standard SR problem, i.e., $\mathbf{x}^\star=\arg\min_\mathbf{x} \lbrace \| \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{D}\mathbf{x} \|_2^2+λ\| \mathbf{x}\|_0 \rbrace$, can be regarded as a limit case of a general maximum a posteriori (MAP) problem involving Bernoulli-Gaussian variables. We then propose different tractable implementations of this MAP problem that we refer to as "Bayesian pursuit algorithms". The Bayesian algorithms are shown to have strong connections with several well-known pursuit algorithms of the literature (e.g., MP, OMP, StOMP, CoSaMP, SP) and generalize them in several respects. In particular, i) they allow for atom deselection; ii) they can include any prior information about the probability of occurrence of each atom within the selection process; iii) they can encompass the estimation of unkown model parameters into their recursions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Enhanced blind decoding of Tardos codes with new map-based functions

This paper presents a new decoder for probabilistic binary traitor tracing codes under the marking assumption. It is based on a binary hypothesis testing rule which integrates a collusion channel relaxation so as to obtain numerical and simple accusation functions. This decoder is blind as no estimation of the collusion channel prior to the accusation is required. Experimentations show that using the proposed decoder gives better performance than the well-known symmetric version of the Tardos decoder for common attack channels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Joint k-step analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit and Orthogonal Least Squares

Tropp's analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) using the Exact Recovery Condition (ERC) is extended to a first exact recovery analysis of Orthogonal Least Squares (OLS). We show that when the ERC is met, OLS is guaranteed to exactly recover the unknown support in at most k iterations. Moreover, we provide a closer look at the analysis of both OMP and OLS when the ERC is not fulfilled. The existence of dictionaries for which some subsets are never recovered by OMP is proved. This phenomenon also appears with basis pursuit where support recovery depends on the sign patterns, but it does not occur for OLS. Finally, numerical experiments show that none of the considered algorithms is uniformly better than the other but for correlated dictionaries, guaranteed exact recovery may be obtained after fewer iterations for OLS than for OMP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access