Source author record

Cathy Maugis-Rabusseau

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.ST Statistics Theory Applications

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2016arXiv

Non-asymptotic detection of two-component mixtures with unknown means

This work is concerned with the detection of a mixture distribution from a $\mathbb{R}$ -valued sample. Given a sample $X_1,\dots,X_n$ and an even density $ϕ$ , our aim is to detect whether the sample distribution is $ϕ(\cdot-μ)$ for some unknown mean $μ$ , or is defined as a two-component mixture based on translations of $ϕ$ . We propose a procedure which is based on several spacings of the order statistics, which provides a level- $α$ test for all $n$ . Our test is therefore a multiple testing procedure and we prove from a theoretical and practical point of view that it automatically adapts to the proportion of the mixture and to the difference of the means of the two components of the mixture under the alternative. From a theoretical point of view, we prove the optimality of the power of our procedure in various situations. A simulation study shows the good performances of our test compared with several classical procedures.

preprint2015arXiv

Multidimensional two-component Gaussian mixtures detection

Let $(X\_1,\ldots,X\_n)$ be a $d$ -dimensional i.i.d sample from a distribution with density $f$ . The problem of detection of a two-component mixture is considered. Our aim is to decide whether $f$ is the density of a standard Gaussian random $d$ -vector ( $f=ϕ\_d$ ) against $f$ is a two-component mixture: $f=(1-\varepsilon)ϕ\_d +\varepsilon ϕ\_d (.-μ)$ where $(\varepsilon,μ)$ are unknown parameters. Optimal separation conditions on $\varepsilon, μ, n$ and the dimension $d$ are established, allowing to separate both hypotheses with prescribed errors. Several testing procedures are proposed and two alternative subsets are considered.

preprint2013arXiv

Comparing Model Selection and Regularization Approaches to Variable Selection in Model-Based Clustering

We compare two major approaches to variable selection in clustering: model selection and regularization. Based on previous results, we select the method of Maugis et al. (2009b), which modified the method of Raftery and Dean (2006), as a current state of the art model selection method. We select the method of Witten and Tibshirani (2010) as a current state of the art regularization method. We compared the methods by simulation in terms of their accuracy in both classification and variable selection. In the first simulation experiment all the variables were conditionally independent given cluster membership. We found that variable selection (of either kind) yielded substantial gains in classification accuracy when the clusters were well separated, but few gains when the clusters were close together. We found that the two variable selection methods had comparable classification accuracy, but that the model selection approach had substantially better accuracy in selecting variables. In our second simulation experiment, there were correlations among the variables given the cluster memberships. We found that the model selection approach was substantially more accurate in terms of both classification and variable selection than the regularization approach, and that both gave more accurate classifications than $K$ -means without variable selection.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.