BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Carol Alexander

Carol Alexander appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
q-fin.STMethodologyq-fin.PRq-fin.RMApplicationsq-fin.GNq-fin.MF

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Net Buying Pressure and the Information in Bitcoin Option Trades

How do supply and demand from informed traders drive market prices of bitcoin options? Deribit options tick-level data supports the limits-to-arbitrage hypothesis about the market maker's supply. The main demand-side effects are that at-the-money option prices are largely driven by volatility traders and out-of-the-money options are simultaneously driven by volatility traders and those with proprietary information about the direction of future bitcoin price movements. The demand-side trading results contrast with prior studies on established options markets in the US and Asia, but we also show that Deribit is rapidly evolving into a more efficient channel for aggregating information from informed traders.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Static and Dynamic Models for Multivariate Distribution Forecasts: Proper Scoring Rule Tests of Factor-Quantile vs. Multivariate GARCH Models

A plethora of static and dynamic models exist to forecast Value-at-Risk and other quantile-related metrics used in financial risk management. Industry practice tends to favour simpler, static models such as historical simulation or its variants whereas most academic research centres on dynamic models in the GARCH family. While numerous studies examine the accuracy of multivariate models for forecasting risk metrics, there is little research on accurately predicting the entire multivariate distribution. Yet this is an essential element of asset pricing or portfolio optimization problems having non-analytic solutions. We approach this highly complex problem using a variety of proper multivariate scoring rules to evaluate over 100,000 forecasts of eight-dimensional multivariate distributions: of exchange rates, interest rates and commodity futures. This way we test the performance of static models, viz. empirical distribution functions and a new factor-quantile model, with commonly used dynamic models in the asymmetric multivariate GARCH class.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Evaluating the Discrimination Ability of Proper Multivariate Scoring Rules

Proper scoring rules are commonly applied to quantify the accuracy of distribution forecasts. Given an observation they assign a scalar score to each distribution forecast, with the the lowest expected score attributed to the true distribution. The energy and variogram scores are two rules that have recently gained some popularity in multivariate settings because their computation does not require a forecast to have parametric density function and so they are broadly applicable. Here we conduct a simulation study to compare the discrimination ability between the energy score and three variogram scores. Compared with other studies, our simulation design is more realistic because it is supported by a historical data set containing commodity prices, currencies and interest rates, and our data generating processes include a diverse selection of models with different marginal distributions, dependence structure, and calibration windows. This facilitates a comprehensive comparison of the performance of proper scoring rules in different settings. To compare the scores we use three metrics: the mean relative score, error rate and a generalised discrimination heuristic. Overall, we find that the variogram score with parameter p=0.5 outperforms the energy score and the other two variogram scores.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Model-Free Discretisation-Invariant Swap Contracts

Realised pay-offs for discretisation-invariant swaps are those which satisfy a restricted `aggregation property' of Neuberger [2012] for twice continuously differentiable deterministic functions of a multivariate martingale. They are initially characterised as solutions to a second-order system of PDEs, then those pay-offs based on martingale and log-martingale processes alone form a vector space. Hence there exist an infinite variety of other variance and higher-moment risk premia that are less prone to bias than standard variance swaps because their option replication portfolios have no discrete-monitoring or jump errors. Their fair values are also independent of the monitoring partition. A sub-class consists of pay-offs with fair values that are further free from numerical integration errors over option strikes. Here exact pricing and hedging is possible via dynamic trading strategies on a few vanilla puts and calls. An S&P 500 empirical study on higher-moment and other DI swaps concludes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Model-Free Discretisation-Invariant Swaps and S&P 500 Higher-Moment Risk Premia

We derive a general multivariate theory for realised characteristics of `model-free discretisation-invariant swaps', so-called because the standard no-arbitrage assumption of martingale forward prices is sufficient to derive fair-value swap rates for such characteristics which have no jump or discretisation errors. This theory underpins specific examples for swaps based on higher moments of a single log return distribution where exact replication is possible via option-implied `fundamental contracts' like the log contact. The common factors determining the S&P 500 risk premia associated with these higher-moment characteristics are investigated empirically at the daily, weekly and monthly frequencies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Tail Risk Premia for Long-Term Equity Investors

We use the P&L on a particular class of swaps, representing variance and higher moments for log returns, as estimators in our empirical study on the S&P500 that investigates the factors determining variance and higher-moment risk premia. This class is the discretisation invariant sub-class of swaps with Neuberger's aggregating characteristics. Besides the market excess return, momentum is the dominant driver for both skewness and kurtosis risk premia, which exhibit a highly significant negative correlation. By contrast, the variance risk premium responds positively to size and negatively to growth, and the correlation between variance and tail risk premia is relatively low compared with previous research, particularly at high sampling frequencies. These findings extend prior research on determinants of these risk premia. Furthermore, our meticulous data-construction methodology avoids unwanted artefacts which distort results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access