Source author record

Bruno Ferman

Bruno Ferman appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

econ.EM math.ST Methodology Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Partial Identification under Stratified Randomization

This paper develops a unified framework for partial identification and inference in stratified experiments with attrition, accommodating both equal and heterogeneous treatment shares across strata. For equal-share designs, we apply recent theory for finely stratified experiments to Lee bounds, yielding closed-form, design-consistent variance estimators and properly sized confidence intervals. Simulations show that the conventional formula can overstate uncertainty, while our approach delivers tighter intervals. When treatment shares differ across strata, we propose a new strategy, which combines inverse probability weighting and global trimming to construct valid bounds even when strata are small or unbalanced. We establish identification, introduce a moment estimator, and extend existing inference results to stratified designs with heterogeneous shares, covering a broad class of moment-based estimators which includes the one we formulate. We also generalize our results to designs in which strata are defined solely by observed labels.

preprint2022arXiv

Inference in Difference-in-Differences: How Much Should We Trust in Independent Clusters?

We analyze the challenges for inference in difference-in-differences (DID) when there is spatial correlation. We present novel theoretical insights and empirical evidence on the settings in which ignoring spatial correlation should lead to more or less distortions in DID applications. We show that details such as the time frame used in the estimation, the choice of the treated and control groups, and the choice of the estimator, are key determinants of distortions due to spatial correlation. We also analyze the feasibility and trade-offs involved in a series of alternatives to take spatial correlation into account. Given that, we provide relevant recommendations for applied researchers on how to mitigate and assess the possibility of inference distortions due to spatial correlation.

preprint2022arXiv

Randomization Inference Tests for Shift-Share Designs

We consider the problem of inference in shift-share research designs. The choice between existing approaches that allow for unrestricted spatial correlation involves tradeoffs, varying in terms of their validity when there are relatively few or concentrated shocks, and in terms of the assumptions on the shock assignment process and treatment effects heterogeneity. We propose alternative randomization inference methods that combine the advantages of different approaches. These methods are valid in finite samples under relatively stronger assumptions, while asymptotically valid under weaker assumptions.

preprint2021arXiv

Synthetic Controls with Imperfect Pre-Treatment Fit

We analyze the properties of the Synthetic Control (SC) and related estimators when the pre-treatment fit is imperfect. In this framework, we show that these estimators are generally biased if treatment assignment is correlated with unobserved confounders, even when the number of pre-treatment periods goes to infinity. Still, we show that a demeaned version of the SC method can substantially improve in terms of bias and variance relative to the difference-in-difference estimator. We also derive a specification test for the demeaned SC estimator in this setting with imperfect pre-treatment fit. Given our theoretical results, we provide practical guidance for applied researchers on how to justify the use of such estimators in empirical applications.

preprint2020arXiv

On the Properties of the Synthetic Control Estimator with Many Periods and Many Controls

We consider the asymptotic properties of the Synthetic Control (SC) estimator when both the number of pre-treatment periods and control units are large. If potential outcomes follow a linear factor model, we provide conditions under which the factor loadings of the SC unit converge in probability to the factor loadings of the treated unit. This happens when there are weights diluted among an increasing number of control units such that a weighted average of the factor loadings of the control units asymptotically reconstructs the factor loadings of the treated unit. In this case, the SC estimator is asymptotically unbiased even when treatment assignment is correlated with time-varying unobservables. This result can be valid even when the number of control units is larger than the number of pre-treatment periods.