Source author record

Bruno Escoffier

Bruno Escoffier appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms Computational Complexity Discrete Mathematics Computer Science and Game Theory Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Weighted majority tournaments and Kemeny ranking with 2-dimensional Euclidean preferences

The assumption that voters' preferences share some common structure is a standard way to circumvent NP-hardness results in social choice problems. While the Kemeny ranking problem is NP-hard in the general case, it is known to become easy if the preferences are 1-dimensional Euclidean. In this note, we prove that the Kemeny ranking problem remains NP-hard for $k$-dimensional Euclidean preferences with $k\!\ge\!2$ under norms $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$ and $\ell_\infty$, by showing that any weighted tournament (resp. weighted bipartite tournament) with weights of same parity (resp. even weights) is inducible as the weighted majority tournament of a profile of 2-Euclidean preferences under norm $\ell_2$ (resp. $\ell_1,\ell_{\infty}$), computable in polynomial time. More generally, this result regarding weighted tournaments implies, essentially, that hardness results relying on the (weighted) majority tournament that hold in the general case (e.g., NP-hardness of Slater ranking) are still true for 2-dimensional Euclidean preferences.

preprint2020arXiv

Online learning for min-max discrete problems

We study various discrete nonlinear combinatorial optimization problems in an online learning framework. In the first part, we address the question of whether there are negative results showing that getting a vanishing (or even vanishing approximate) regret is computational hard. We provide a general reduction showing that many (min-max) polynomial time solvable problems not only do not have a vanishing regret, but also no vanishing approximation $α$-regret, for some $α$ (unless $NP=BPP$). Then, we focus on a particular min-max problem, the min-max version of the vertex cover problem which is solvable in polynomial time in the offline case. The previous reduction proves that there is no $(2-ε)$-regret online algorithm, unless Unique Game is in $BPP$; we prove a matching upper bound providing an online algorithm based on the online gradient descent method. Then, we turn our attention to online learning algorithms that are based on an offline optimization oracle that, given a set of instances of the problem, is able to compute the optimum static solution. We show that for different nonlinear discrete optimization problems, it is strongly $NP$-hard to solve the offline optimization oracle, even for problems that can be solved in polynomial time in the static case (e.g. min-max vertex cover, min-max perfect matching, etc.). On the positive side, we present an online algorithm with vanishing regret that is based on the follow the perturbed leader algorithm for a generalized knapsack problem.

preprint2020arXiv

Recognizing Single-Peaked Preferences on an Arbitrary Graph: Complexity and Algorithms

This paper is devoted to a study of single-peakedness on arbitrary graphs. Given a collection of preferences (rankings of a set of alternatives), we aim at determining a connected graph G on which the preferences are single-peaked, in the sense that all the preferences are traversals of G. Note that a collection of preferences is always single-peaked on the complete graph. We propose an Integer Linear Programming formulation (ILP) of the problem of minimizing the number of edges in G or the maximum degree of a vertex in G. We prove that both problems are NP-hard in the general case. However, we show that if the optimal number of edges is m-1 (where m is the number of candidates) then any optimal solution of the ILP is integer and thus the integrality constraints can be relaxed. This provides an alternative proof of the polynomial-time complexity of recognizing single-peaked preferences on a tree. We prove the same result for the case of a path (an axis), providing here also an alternative proof of polynomiality of the recognition problem. Furthermore, we provide a polynomial-time procedure to recognize single-peaked preferences on a pseudotree (a connected graph that contains at most one cycle). We also give some experimental results, both on real and synthetic datasets.

preprint2015arXiv

A 0.821-ratio purely combinatorial algorithm for maximum $k$-vertex cover in bipartite graphs

Our goal in this paper is to propose a \textit{combinatorial algorithm} that beats the only such algorithm known previously, the greedy one. We study the polynomial approximation of the Maximum Vertex Cover Problem in bipartite graphs by a purely combinatorial algorithm and present a computer assisted analysis of it, that finds the worst case approximation guarantee that is bounded below by~0.821.

preprint2013arXiv

Multi-parameter complexity analysis for constrained size graph problems: using greediness for parameterization

We study the parameterized complexity of a broad class of problems called "local graph partitioning problems" that includes the classical fixed cardinality problems as max k-vertex cover, k-densest subgraph, etc. By developing a technique "greediness-for-parameterization", we obtain fixed parameter algorithms with respect to a pair of parameters k, the size of the solution (but not its value) and Δ, the maximum degree of the input graph. In particular, greediness-for-parameterization improves asymptotic running times for these problems upon random separation (that is a special case of color coding) and is more intuitive and simple. Then, we show how these results can be easily extended for getting standard-parameterization results (i.e., with parameter the value of the optimal solution) for a well known local graph partitioning problem.

preprint2012arXiv

Subexponential and FPT-time Inapproximability of Independent Set and Related Problems

Fixed-parameter algorithms, approximation algorithms and moderately exponential algorithms are three major approaches to algorithms design. While each of them being very active in its own, there is an increasing attention to the connection between different approaches. In particular, whether Maximum Independent Set would be better approximable once endowed with subexponential-time or FPT-time is a central question. In this paper, we present a strong link between the linear PCP conjecture and the inapproximability, thus partially answering this question.

preprint2010arXiv

Minimum regulation of uncoordinated matchings

Due to the lack of coordination, it is unlikely that the selfish players of a strategic game reach a socially good state. A possible way to cope with selfishness is to compute a desired outcome (if it is tractable) and impose it. However this answer is often inappropriate because compelling an agent can be costly, unpopular or just hard to implement. Since both situations (no coordination and full coordination) show opposite advantages and drawbacks, it is natural to study possible tradeoffs. In this paper we study a strategic game where the nodes of a simple graph G are independent agents who try to form pairs: e.g. jobs and applicants, tennis players for a match, etc. In many instances of the game, a Nash equilibrium significantly deviates from a social optimum. We analyze a scenario where we fix the strategy of some players; the other players are free to make their choice. The goal is to compel a minimum number of players and guarantee that any possible equilibrium of the modified game is a social optimum, i.e. created pairs must form a maximum matching of G. We mainly show that this intriguing problem is NP-hard and propose an approximation algorithm with a constant ratio.

preprint2009arXiv

Fast algorithms for min independent dominating set

We first devise a branching algorithm that computes a minimum independent dominating set on any graph with running time O*(2^0.424n) and polynomial space. This improves the O*(2^0.441n) result by (S. Gaspers and M. Liedloff, A branch-and-reduce algorithm for finding a minimum independent dominating set in graphs, Proc. WG'06). We then show that, for every r>3, it is possible to compute an r-((r-1)/r)log_2(r)-approximate solution for min independent dominating set within time O*(2^(nlog_2(r)/r)).