BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Bruno Escoffier

Bruno Escoffier contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete MathematicsArtificial IntelligenceComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game TheoryData Structures and AlgorithmsMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Weighted majority tournaments and Kemeny ranking with 2-dimensional Euclidean preferences

The assumption that voters' preferences share some common structure is a standard way to circumvent NP-hardness results in social choice problems. While the Kemeny ranking problem is NP-hard in the general case, it is known to become easy if the preferences are 1-dimensional Euclidean. In this note, we prove that the Kemeny ranking problem remains NP-hard for $k$-dimensional Euclidean preferences with $k\!\ge\!2$ under norms $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$ and $\ell_\infty$, by showing that any weighted tournament (resp. weighted bipartite tournament) with weights of same parity (resp. even weights) is inducible as the weighted majority tournament of a profile of 2-Euclidean preferences under norm $\ell_2$ (resp. $\ell_1,\ell_{\infty}$), computable in polynomial time. More generally, this result regarding weighted tournaments implies, essentially, that hardness results relying on the (weighted) majority tournament that hold in the general case (e.g., NP-hardness of Slater ranking) are still true for 2-dimensional Euclidean preferences.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Online learning for min-max discrete problems

We study various discrete nonlinear combinatorial optimization problems in an online learning framework. In the first part, we address the question of whether there are negative results showing that getting a vanishing (or even vanishing approximate) regret is computational hard. We provide a general reduction showing that many (min-max) polynomial time solvable problems not only do not have a vanishing regret, but also no vanishing approximation $α$-regret, for some $α$ (unless $NP=BPP$). Then, we focus on a particular min-max problem, the min-max version of the vertex cover problem which is solvable in polynomial time in the offline case. The previous reduction proves that there is no $(2-ε)$-regret online algorithm, unless Unique Game is in $BPP$; we prove a matching upper bound providing an online algorithm based on the online gradient descent method. Then, we turn our attention to online learning algorithms that are based on an offline optimization oracle that, given a set of instances of the problem, is able to compute the optimum static solution. We show that for different nonlinear discrete optimization problems, it is strongly $NP$-hard to solve the offline optimization oracle, even for problems that can be solved in polynomial time in the static case (e.g. min-max vertex cover, min-max perfect matching, etc.). On the positive side, we present an online algorithm with vanishing regret that is based on the follow the perturbed leader algorithm for a generalized knapsack problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Recognizing Single-Peaked Preferences on an Arbitrary Graph: Complexity and Algorithms

This paper is devoted to a study of single-peakedness on arbitrary graphs. Given a collection of preferences (rankings of a set of alternatives), we aim at determining a connected graph G on which the preferences are single-peaked, in the sense that all the preferences are traversals of G. Note that a collection of preferences is always single-peaked on the complete graph. We propose an Integer Linear Programming formulation (ILP) of the problem of minimizing the number of edges in G or the maximum degree of a vertex in G. We prove that both problems are NP-hard in the general case. However, we show that if the optimal number of edges is m-1 (where m is the number of candidates) then any optimal solution of the ILP is integer and thus the integrality constraints can be relaxed. This provides an alternative proof of the polynomial-time complexity of recognizing single-peaked preferences on a tree. We prove the same result for the case of a path (an axis), providing here also an alternative proof of polynomiality of the recognition problem. Furthermore, we provide a polynomial-time procedure to recognize single-peaked preferences on a pseudotree (a connected graph that contains at most one cycle). We also give some experimental results, both on real and synthetic datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access