BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Brian Bullins

Brian Bullins contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCData Structures and AlgorithmsMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Convex optimization with $p$-norm oracles

In recent years, there have been significant advances in efficiently solving $\ell_s$-regression using linear system solvers and $\ell_2$-regression [Adil-Kyng-Peng-Sachdeva, J. ACM&#39;24]. Would efficient smoothed $\ell_p$-norm solvers lead to even faster rates for solving $\ell_s$-regression when $2 \leq p < s$? In this paper, we give an affirmative answer to this question and show how to solve $\ell_s$-regression using $\tilde{O}(n^{\fracν{1+ν}})$ iterations of solving smoothed $\ell_p$ regression problems, where $ν:= \frac{1}{p} - \frac{1}{s}$. To obtain this result, we provide improved accelerated rates for convex optimization problems when given access to an $\ell_p^s(λ)$-proximal oracle, which, for a point $c$, returns the solution of the regularized problem $\min_{x} f(x) + λ||x-c||_p^s$. Additionally, we show that these rates for the $\ell_p^s(λ)$-proximal oracle are optimal for algorithms that query in the span of the outputs of the oracle, and we further apply our techniques to settings of high-order and quasi-self-concordant optimization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Optimal Methods for Higher-Order Smooth Monotone Variational Inequalities

In this work, we present new simple and optimal algorithms for solving the variational inequality (VI) problem for $p^{th}$-order smooth, monotone operators -- a problem that generalizes convex optimization and saddle-point problems. Recent works (Bullins and Lai (2020), Lin and Jordan (2021), Jiang and Mokhtari (2022)) present methods that achieve a rate of $\tilde{O}(ε^{-2/(p+1)})$ for $p\geq 1$, extending results by (Nemirovski (2004)) and (Monteiro and Svaiter (2012)) for $p=1,2$. A drawback to these approaches, however, is their reliance on a line search scheme. We provide the first $p^{\textrm{th}}$-order method that achieves a rate of $O(ε^{-2/(p+1)}).$ Our method does not rely on a line search routine, thereby improving upon previous rates by a logarithmic factor. Building on the Mirror Prox method of Nemirovski (2004), our algorithm works even in the constrained, non-Euclidean setting. Furthermore, we prove the optimality of our algorithm by constructing matching lower bounds. These are the first lower bounds for smooth MVIs beyond convex optimization for $p > 1$. This establishes a separation between solving smooth MVIs and smooth convex optimization, and settles the oracle complexity of solving $p^{\textrm{th}}$-order smooth MVIs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Almost-linear-time Weighted $\ell_p$-norm Solvers in Slightly Dense Graphs via Sparsification

We give almost-linear-time algorithms for constructing sparsifiers with $n\ poly(\log n)$ edges that approximately preserve weighted $(\ell^{2}_2 + \ell^{p}_p)$ flow or voltage objectives on graphs. For flow objectives, this is the first sparsifier construction for such mixed objectives beyond unit $\ell_p$ weights, and is based on expander decompositions. For voltage objectives, we give the first sparsifier construction for these objectives, which we build using graph spanners and leverage score sampling. Together with the iterative refinement framework of [Adil et al, SODA 2019], and a new multiplicative-weights based constant-approximation algorithm for mixed-objective flows or voltages, we show how to find $(1+2^{-\text{poly}(\log n)})$ approximations for weighted $\ell_p$-norm minimizing flows or voltages in $p(m^{1+o(1)} + n^{4/3 + o(1)})$ time for $p=ω(1),$ which is almost-linear for graphs that are slightly dense ($m \ge n^{4/3 + o(1)}$).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Adaptive regularization with cubics on manifolds

Adaptive regularization with cubics (ARC) is an algorithm for unconstrained, non-convex optimization. Akin to the popular trust-region method, its iterations can be thought of as approximate, safe-guarded Newton steps. For cost functions with Lipschitz continuous Hessian, ARC has optimal iteration complexity, in the sense that it produces an iterate with gradient smaller than $\varepsilon$ in $O(1/\varepsilon^{1.5})$ iterations. For the same price, it can also guarantee a Hessian with smallest eigenvalue larger than $-\varepsilon^{1/2}$. In this paper, we study a generalization of ARC to optimization on Riemannian manifolds. In particular, we generalize the iteration complexity results to this richer framework. Our central contribution lies in the identification of appropriate manifold-specific assumptions that allow us to secure these complexity guarantees both when using the exponential map and when using a general retraction. A substantial part of the paper is devoted to studying these assumptions---relevant beyond ARC---and providing user-friendly sufficient conditions for them. Numerical experiments are encouraging.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Higher-order methods for convex-concave min-max optimization and monotone variational inequalities

We provide improved convergence rates for constrained convex-concave min-max problems and monotone variational inequalities with higher-order smoothness. In min-max settings where the $p^{th}$-order derivatives are Lipschitz continuous, we give an algorithm HigherOrderMirrorProx that achieves an iteration complexity of $O(1/T^{\frac{p+1}{2}})$ when given access to an oracle for finding a fixed point of a $p^{th}$-order equation. We give analogous rates for the weak monotone variational inequality problem. For $p>2$, our results improve upon the iteration complexity of the first-order Mirror Prox method of Nemirovski [2004] and the second-order method of Monteiro and Svaiter [2012]. We further instantiate our entire algorithm in the unconstrained $p=2$ case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?

We study local SGD (also known as parallel SGD and federated averaging), a natural and frequently used stochastic distributed optimization method. Its theoretical foundations are currently lacking and we highlight how all existing error guarantees in the convex setting are dominated by a simple baseline, minibatch SGD. (1) For quadratic objectives we prove that local SGD strictly dominates minibatch SGD and that accelerated local SGD is minimax optimal for quadratics; (2) For general convex objectives we provide the first guarantee that at least sometimes improves over minibatch SGD; (3) We show that indeed local SGD does not dominate minibatch SGD by presenting a lower bound on the performance of local SGD that is worse than the minibatch SGD guarantee.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access