BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Brandon Legried

Brandon Legried contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.PRmath.STPopulations and EvolutionStatistics TheoryComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Impossibility of phylogeny reconstruction from $k$-mer counts

We consider phylogeny estimation under a two-state model of sequence evolution by site substitution on a tree. In the asymptotic regime where the sequence lengths tend to infinity, we show that for any fixed $k$ no statistically consistent phylogeny estimation is possible from $k$-mer counts over the full leaf sequences alone. Formally, we establish that the joint distribution of $k$-mer counts over the entire leaf sequences on two distinct trees have total variation distance bounded away from $1$ as the sequence length tends to infinity. Our impossibility result implies that statistical consistency requires more sophisticated use of $k$-mer count information, such as block techniques developed in previous theoretical work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Pairwise sequence alignment at arbitrarily large evolutionary distance

Ancestral sequence reconstruction is a key task in computational biology. It consists in inferring a molecular sequence at an ancestral species of a known phylogeny, given descendant sequences at the tip of the tree. In addition to its many biological applications, it has played a key role in elucidating the statistical performance of phylogeny estimation methods. Here we establish a formal connection to another important bioinformatics problem, multiple sequence alignment, where one attempts to best align a collection of molecular sequences under some mismatch penalty score by inserting gaps. Our result is counter-intuitive: we show that perfect pairwise sequence alignment with high probability is possible in principle at arbitrary large evolutionary distances - provided the phylogeny is known and dense enough. We use techniques from ancestral sequence reconstruction in the taxon-rich setting together with the probabilistic analysis of sequence evolution models involving insertions and deletions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Species tree estimation under joint modeling of coalescence and duplication: sample complexity of quartet methods

We consider species tree estimation under a standard stochastic model of gene tree evolution that incorporates incomplete lineage sorting (as modeled by a coalescent process) and gene duplication and loss (as modeled by a branching process). Through a probabilistic analysis of the model, we derive sample complexity bounds for widely used quartet-based inference methods that highlight the effect of the duplication and loss rates in both subcritical and supercritical regimes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access