BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Boris Glavic

Boris Glavic contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
DatabasesComputational ComplexityMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Computing expected multiplicities for bag-TIDBs with bounded multiplicities

In this work, we study the problem of computing a tuple's expected multiplicity over probabilistic databases with bag semantics (where each tuple is associated with a multiplicity) exactly and approximately. We consider bag-TIDBs where we have a bound $c$ on the maximum multiplicity of each tuple and tuples are independent probabilistic events (we refer to such databases as c-TIDBs. We are specifically interested in the fine-grained complexity of computing expected multiplicities and how it compares to the complexity of deterministic query evaluation algorithms -- if these complexities are comparable, it opens the door to practical deployment of probabilistic databases. Unfortunately, our results imply that computing expected multiplicities for c-TIDBs based on the results produced by such query evaluation algorithms introduces super-linear overhead (under parameterized complexity hardness assumptions/conjectures). We proceed to study approximation of expected result tuple multiplicities for positive relational algebra queries ($RA^+$) over c-TIDBs and for a non-trivial subclass of block-independent databases (BIDBs). We develop a sampling algorithm that computes a 1$\pmε$ approximation of the expected multiplicity of an output tuple in time linear in the runtime of the corresponding deterministic query for any $RA^+$ query.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Efficient Answering of Historical What-if Queries

We introduce historical what-if queries, a novel type of what-if analysis that determines the effect of a hypothetical change to the transactional history of a database. For example, "how would revenue be affected if we would have charged an additional $6 for shipping?" Such queries may lead to more actionable insights than traditional what-if queries as their results can be used to inform future actions, e.g., increasing shipping fees. We develop efficient techniques for answering historical what-if queries, i.e., determining how a modified history affects the current database state. Our techniques are based on reenactment, a replay technique for transactional histories. We optimize this process using program and data slicing techniques that determine which updates and what data can be excluded from reenactment without affecting the result. Using an implementation of our techniques in Mahif (a Middleware for Answering Historical what-IF queries) we demonstrate their effectiveness experimentally.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Interpretable Data-Based Explanations for Fairness Debugging

A wide variety of fairness metrics and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches have been proposed in the literature to identify bias in machine learning models that are used in critical real-life contexts. However, merely reporting on a model's bias, or generating explanations using existing XAI techniques is insufficient to locate and eventually mitigate sources of bias. We introduce Gopher, a system that produces compact, interpretable and causal explanations for bias or unexpected model behavior by identifying coherent subsets of the training data that are root-causes for this behavior. Specifically, we introduce the concept of causal responsibility that quantifies the extent to which intervening on training data by removing or updating subsets of it can resolve the bias. Building on this concept, we develop an efficient approach for generating the top-k patterns that explain model bias that utilizes techniques from the machine learning (ML) community to approximate causal responsibility and uses pruning rules to manage the large search space for patterns. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of Gopher in generating interpretable explanations for identifying and debugging sources of bias.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Efficient Uncertainty Tracking for Complex Queries with Attribute-level Bounds (extended version)

Certain answers are a principled method for coping with the uncertainty that arises in many practical data management tasks. Unfortunately, this method is expensive and may exclude useful (if uncertain) answers. Prior work introduced Uncertainty Annotated Databases (UA-DBs), which combine an under- and over-approximation of certain answers. UA-DBs combine the reliability of certain answers based on incomplete K-relations with the performance of classical deterministic database systems. However, UA-DBs only support a limited class of queries and do not support attribute-level uncertainty which can lead to inaccurate under-approximations of certain answers. In this paper, we introduce attribute-annotated uncertain databases (AU-DBs) which extend the UA-DB model with attribute-level annotations that record bounds on the values of an attribute across all possible worlds. This enables more precise approximations of incomplete databases. Furthermore, we extend UA-DBs to encode an compact over-approximation of possible answers which is necessary to support non-monotone queries including aggregation and set difference. We prove that query processing over AU-DBs preserves the bounds of certain and possible answers and investigate algorithms for compacting intermediate results to retain efficiency. Through an compact encoding of possible answers, our approach also provides a solid foundation for handling missing data. Using optimizations that trade accuracy for performance, our approach scales to complex queries and large datasets, and produces accurate results. Furthermore, it significantly outperforms alternative methods for uncertain data management.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Approximate Summaries for Why and Why-not Provenance (Extended Version)

Why and why-not provenance have been studied extensively in recent years. However, why-not provenance, and to a lesser degree why provenance, can be very large resulting in severe scalability and usability challenges. In this paper, we introduce a novel approximate summarization technique for provenance which overcomes these challenges. Our approach uses patterns to encode (why-not) provenance concisely. We develop techniques for efficiently computing provenance summaries balancing informativeness, conciseness, and completeness. To achieve scalability, we integrate sampling techniques into provenance capture and summarization. Our approach is the first to scale to large datasets and to generate comprehensive and meaningful summaries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access