Source author record

Boguslaw Obara

Boguslaw Obara appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Camera Bias in a Fine Grained Classification Task

We show that correlations between the camera used to acquire an image and the class label of that image can be exploited by convolutional neural networks (CNN), resulting in a model that "cheats" at an image classification task by recognizing which camera took the image and inferring the class label from the camera. We show that models trained on a dataset with camera / label correlations do not generalize well to images in which those correlations are absent, nor to images from unencountered cameras. Furthermore, we investigate which visual features they are exploiting for camera recognition. Our experiments present evidence against the importance of global color statistics, lens deformation and chromatic aberration, and in favor of high frequency features, which may be introduced by image processing algorithms built into the cameras.

preprint2020arXiv

Segmentation of Macular Edema Datasets with Small Residual 3D U-Net Architectures

This paper investigates the application of deep convolutional neural networks with prohibitively small datasets to the problem of macular edema segmentation. In particular, we investigate several different heavily regularized architectures. We find that, contrary to popular belief, neural architectures within this application setting are able to achieve close to human-level performance on unseen test images without requiring large numbers of training examples. Annotating these 3D datasets is difficult, with multiple criteria required. It takes an experienced clinician two days to annotate a single 3D image, whereas our trained model achieves similar performance in less than a second. We found that an approach which uses targeted dataset augmentation, alongside architectural simplification with an emphasis on residual design, has acceptable generalization performance - despite relying on fewer than 15 training examples.