BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Bo Markussen

Bo Markussen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applicationsmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Too Many, Too Improbable: testing joint hypotheses and closed testing shortcuts

Hypothesis testing is a key part of empirical science and multiple testing as well as the combination of evidence from several tests are continued areas of research. In this article we consider the problem of combining the results of multiple hypothesis tests to i) test global hypotheses and ii) make marginal inference while controlling the k-FWER. We propose a new family of combination tests for joint hypotheses, called the 'Too Many, Too Improbable' (TMTI) statistics, which we show through simulation to have higher power than other combination tests against many alternatives. Furthermore, we prove that a large family of combination tests -- which includes the one we propose but also other combination tests -- admits a quadratic shortcut when used in a Closed Testing Procedure, which controls the FWER strongly. We develop an algorithm that is linear in the number of hypotheses for obtaining confidence sets for the number of false hypotheses among a collection of hypotheses and an algorithm that is cubic in the number of hypotheses for controlling the k-FWER for any k greater than one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Simultaneous inference for misaligned multivariate functional data

We consider inference for misaligned multivariate functional data that represents the same underlying curve, but where the functional samples have systematic differences in shape. In this paper we introduce a new class of generally applicable models where warping effects are modeled through nonlinear transformation of latent Gaussian variables and systematic shape differences are modeled by Gaussian processes. To model cross-covariance between sample coordinates we introduce a class of low-dimensional cross-covariance structures suitable for modeling multivariate functional data. We present a method for doing maximum-likelihood estimation in the models and apply the method to three data sets. The first data set is from a motion tracking system where the spatial positions of a large number of body-markers are tracked in three-dimensions over time. The second data set consists of height and weight measurements for Danish boys. The third data set consists of three-dimensional spatial hand paths from a controlled obstacle-avoidance experiment. We use the developed method to estimate the cross-covariance structure, and use a classification setup to demonstrate that the method outperforms state-of-the-art methods for handling misaligned curve data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Separating timing, movement conditions and individual differences in the analysis of human movement

A central task in the analysis of human movement behavior is to determine systematic patterns and differences across experimental conditions, participants and repetitions. This is possible because human movement is highly regular, being constrained by invariance principles. Movement timing and movement path, in particular, are linked through scaling laws. Separating variations of movement timing from the spatial variations of movements is a well-known challenge that is addressed in current approaches only through forms of preprocessing that bias analysis. Here we propose a novel nonlinear mixed-effects model for analyzing temporally continuous signals that contain systematic effects in both timing and path. Identifiability issues of path relative to timing are overcome by using maximum likelihood estimation in which the most likely separation of space and time is chosen given the variation found in data. The model is applied to analyze experimental data of human arm movements in which participants move a hand-held object to a target location while avoiding an obstacle. The model is used to classify movement data according to participant. Comparison to alternative approaches establishes nonlinear mixed-effects models as viable alternatives to conventional analysis frameworks. The model is then combined with a novel factor-analysis model that estimates the low-dimensional subspace within which movements vary when the task demands vary. Our framework enables us to visualize different dimensions of movement variation and to test hypotheses about the effect of obstacle placement and height on the movement path. We demonstrate that the approach can be used to uncover new properties of human movement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access