BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Bjorn De Sutter

Bjorn De Sutter appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Cryptography and SecurityDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingProgramming LanguagesSoftware Engineering

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Man-at-the-End Software Protection as a Risk Analysis Process

The last years have seen an increase of Man-at-the-End (MATE) attacks against software applications, both in number and severity. However, MATE software protections are dominated by fuzzy concepts and techniques, with security-through-obscurity omnipresent in the field. This paper presents a rationale for adopting and standardizing the protection of software as a risk management process according to the NIST SP800-39 approach. We examine the relevant aspects of formalizing and automating the activities in this process in the context of MATE software protection. We highlight the open issues that the research community still has to address. We discuss the benefits that such an approach can bring to all stakeholders. In addition, we present a Proof of Concept (PoC) of a decision support system that automates many activities in the risk analysis methodology towards the protection of software applications. Despite still being a prototype, the PoC validation with industry experts indicated that several aspects of the proposed risk management process can already be formalized and automated with our existing toolbox, and that it can actually assist decision making in industrially relevant settings

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Code Renewability for Native Software Protection

Software protection aims at safeguarding assets embedded in software by preventing and delaying reverse engineering and tampering attacks. This paper presents an architecture and supporting tool flow to renew parts of native applications dynamically. Renewed and diversified code and data belonging to either the original application or to linked-in protections are delivered from a secure server to a client on demand. This results in frequent changes to the software components when they are under attack, thus making attacks harder. By supporting various forms of diversification and renewability, novel protection combinations become available, and existing combinations become stronger. The prototype implementation is evaluated on a number of industrial use cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

High-level GPU programming in Julia

GPUs are popular devices for accelerating scientific calculations. However, as GPU code is usually written in low-level languages, it breaks the abstractions of high-level languages popular with scientific programmers. To overcome this, we present a framework for CUDA GPU programming in the high-level Julia programming language. This framework compiles Julia source code for GPU execution, and takes care of the necessary low-level interactions using modern code generation techniques to avoid run-time overhead. Evaluating the framework and its APIs on a case study comprising the trace transform from the field of image processing, we find that the impact on performance is minimal, while greatly increasing programmer productivity. The metaprogramming capabilities of the Julia language proved invaluable for enabling this. Our framework significantly improves usability of GPUs, making them accessible for a wide range of programmers. It is available as free and open-source software licensed under the MIT License.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Multi-Variant Execution of Parallel Programs

Multi-Variant Execution Environments (MVEEs) are a promising technique to protect software against memory corruption attacks. They transparently execute multiple, diversified variants (often referred to as replicae) of the software receiving the same inputs. By enforcing and monitoring the lock-step execution of the replicae's system calls, and by deploying diversity techniques that prevent an attacker from simultaneously compromising multiple replicae, MVEEs can block attacks before they succeed. Existing MVEEs cannot handle non-trivial multi-threaded programs because their undeterministic behavior introduces benign system call inconsistencies in the replicae, which trigger false positive detections and deadlocks in the MVEEs. This paper for the first time extends the generality of MVEEs to protect multi-threaded software by means of secure and efficient synchronization replication agents. On the PARSEC 2.1 parallel benchmarks running with four worker threads, our prototype MVEE incurs a run-time overhead of only 1.32x.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access