Researcher profile

Bingkai Lin

Bingkai Lin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Lower Bounds of Approximating Parameterized $k$-Clique

Given a simple graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the goal of $k$-Clique problem is to decide if $G$ contains a complete subgraph of size $k$. We say an algorithm approximates $k$-Clique within a factor $g(k)$ if it can find a clique of size at least $k / g(k)$ when $G$ is guaranteed to have a $k$-clique. Recently, it was shown that approximating $k$-Clique within a constant factor is W[1]-hard [Lin21]. We study the approximation of $k$-Clique under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). The reduction of [Lin21] already implies an $n^{Ω(\sqrt[6]{\log k})}$-time lower bound under ETH. We improve this lower bound to $n^{Ω(\log k)}$. Using the gap-amplification technique by expander graphs, we also prove that there is no $k^{o(1)}$ factor FPT-approximation algorithm for $k$-Clique under ETH. We also suggest a new way to prove the Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) under ETH. We show that if there is no $n^{O(\frac{k}{\log k})}$ algorithm to approximate $k$-Clique within a constant factor, then PIH is true.

preprint2021arXiv

Constant Approximating k-Clique is W[1]-hard

For every graph $G$, let $ω(G)$ be the largest size of complete subgraph in $G$. This paper presents a simple algorithm which, on input a graph $G$, a positive integer $k$ and a small constant $ε>0$, outputs a graph $G&#39;$ and an integer $k&#39;$ in $2^{Θ(k^5)}\cdot |G|^{O(1)}$-time such that (1) $k&#39;\le 2^{Θ(k^5)}$, (2) if $ω(G)\ge k$, then $ω(G&#39;)\ge k&#39;$, (3) if $ω(G)<k$, then $ω(G&#39;)< (1-ε)k&#39;$. This implies that no $f(k)\cdot |G|^{O(1)}$-time algorithm can distinguish between the cases $ω(G)\ge k$ and $ω(G)<k/c$ for any constant $c\ge 1$ and computable function $f$, unless $FPT= W[1]$.

preprint2012arXiv

The parameterized complexity of k-edge induced subgraphs

We prove that finding a $k$-edge induced subgraph is fixed-parameter tractable, thereby answering an open problem of Leizhen Cai. Our algorithm is based on several combinatorial observations, Gauss&#39; famous \emph{Eureka} theorem [Andrews, 86], and a generalization of the well-known fpt-algorithm for the model-checking problem for first-order logic on graphs with locally bounded tree-width due to Frick and Grohe [Frick and Grohe, 01]. On the other hand, we show that two natural counting versions of the problem are hard. Hence, the $k$-edge induced subgraph problem is one of the rare known examples in parameterized complexity that are easy for decision while hard for counting.