BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Bingbing Sun

Bingbing Sun contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.geo-phMachine Learningphysics.app-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Time-lapse data matching using a recurrent neural network approach

Time-lapse seismic data acquisition is an essential tool to monitor changes in a reservoir due to fluid injection, such as CO$_2$ injection. By acquiring multiple seismic surveys in the exact location, we can identify the reservoir changes by analyzing the difference in the data. However, such analysis can be skewed by the near-surface seasonal velocity variations, inaccuracy in the acquisition parameters, and other inevitable noise. The common practice (cross-equalization) to address this problem uses the part of the data where changes are not expected to design a matching filter and then apply it to the whole data, including the reservoir area. Like cross-equalization, we train a recurrent neural network on parts of the data excluding the reservoir area and then infer the reservoir-related data. The recurrent neural network can learn the time dependency of the data, unlike the matching filter that processes the data based on the local information obtained in the filter window. We demonstrate the method of matching the data in various examples and compare it with the conventional matching filter. Specifically, we start by demonstrating the ability of the approach in matching two traces and then test the method on a pre-stack 2D synthetic data. Then, we verify the enhancements of the 4D signal by providing RTM images. We measure the repeatability using normalized root mean square and predictability metrics and show that in some cases, it overcomes the matching filter approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A data-driven choice of misfit function for FWI using reinforcement learning

In the workflow of Full-Waveform Inversion (FWI), we often tune the parameters of the inversion to help us avoid cycle skipping and obtain high resolution models. For example, typically start by using objective functions that avoid cycle skipping, like tomographic and image based or using only low frequency, and then later, we utilize the least squares misfit to admit high resolution information. We also may perform an isotropic (acoustic) inversion to first update the velocity model and then switch to multi-parameter anisotropic (elastic) inversions to fully recover the complex physics. Such hierarchical approaches are common in FWI, and they often depend on our manual intervention based on many factors, and of course, results depend on experience. However, with the large data size often involved in the inversion and the complexity of the process, making optimal choices is difficult even for an experienced practitioner. Thus, as an example, and within the framework of reinforcement learning, we utilize a deep-Q network (DQN) to learn an optimal policy to determine the proper timing to switch between different misfit functions. Specifically, we train the state-action value function (Q) to predict when to use the conventional L2-norm misfit function or the more advanced optimal-transport matching-filter (OTMF) misfit to mitigate the cycle-skipping and obtain high resolution, as well as improve convergence. We use a simple while demonstrative shifted-signal inversion examples to demonstrate the basic principles of the proposed method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

ML-misfit: Learning a robust misfit function for full-waveform inversion using machine learning

Most of the available advanced misfit functions for full waveform inversion (FWI) are hand-crafted, and the performance of those misfit functions is data-dependent. Thus, we propose to learn a misfit function for FWI, entitled ML-misfit, based on machine learning. Inspired by the optimal transport of the matching filter misfit, we design a neural network (NN) architecture for the misfit function in a form similar to comparing the mean and variance for two distributions. To guarantee the resulting learned misfit is a metric, we accommodate the symmetry of the misfit with respect to its input and a Hinge loss regularization term in a meta-loss function to satisfy the "triangle inequality" rule. In the framework of meta-learning, we train the network by running FWI to invert for randomly generated velocity models and update the parameters of the NN by minimizing the meta-loss, which is defined as accumulated difference between the true and inverted models. We first illustrate the basic principle of the ML-misfit for learning a convex misfit function for travel-time shifted signals. Further, we train the NN on 2D horizontally layered models, and we demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the learned ML-misfit by applying it to the well-known Marmousi model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access