Source author record

Bing Mao

Bing Mao appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

AVMiner: Expansible and Semantic-Preserving Anti-Virus Labels Mining Method

With the increase in the variety and quantity of malware, there is an urgent need to speed up the diagnosis and the analysis of malware. Extracting the malware family-related tokens from AV (Anti-Virus) labels, provided by online anti-virus engines, paves the way for pre-diagnosing the malware. Automatically extract the vital information from AV labels will greatly enhance the detection ability of security enterprises and equip the research ability of security analysts. Recent works like AVCLASS and AVCLASS2 try to extract the attributes of malware from AV labels and establish the taxonomy based on expert knowledge. However, due to the uncertain trend of complicated malicious behaviors, the system needs the following abilities to face the challenge: preserving vital semantics, being expansible, and free from expert knowledge. In this work, we present AVMiner, an expansible malware tagging system that can mine the most vital tokens from AV labels. AVMiner adopts natural language processing techniques and clustering methods to generate a sequence of tokens without expert knowledge ranked by importance. AVMiner can self-update when new samples come. Finally, we evaluate AVMiner on over 8,000 samples from well-known datasets with manually labeled ground truth, which outperforms previous works.

preprint2020arXiv

An Empirical Study on Benchmarks of Artificial Software Vulnerabilities

Recently, various techniques (e.g., fuzzing) have been developed for vulnerability detection. To evaluate those techniques, the community has been developing benchmarks of artificial vulnerabilities because of a shortage of ground-truth. However, people have concerns that such vulnerabilities cannot represent reality and may lead to unreliable and misleading results. Unfortunately, there lacks research on handling such concerns. In this work, to understand how close these benchmarks mirror reality, we perform an empirical study on three artificial vulnerability benchmarks - LAVA-M, Rode0day and CGC (2669 bugs) and various real-world memory-corruption vulnerabilities (80 CVEs). Furthermore, we propose a model to depict the properties of memory-corruption vulnerabilities. Following this model, we conduct intensive experiments and data analyses. Our analytic results reveal that while artificial benchmarks attempt to approach the real world, they still significantly differ from reality. Based on the findings, we propose a set of strategies to improve the quality of artificial benchmarks.

preprint2020arXiv

SoK: All You Ever Wanted to Know About x86/x64 Binary Disassembly But Were Afraid to Ask

Disassembly of binary code is hard, but necessary for improving the security of binary software. Over the past few decades, research in binary disassembly has produced many tools and frameworks, which have been made available to researchers and security professionals. These tools employ a variety of strategies that grant them different characteristics. The lack of systematization, however, impedes new research in the area and makes selecting the right tool hard, as we do not understand the strengths and weaknesses of existing tools. In this paper, we systematize binary disassembly through the study of nine popular, open-source tools. We couple the manual examination of their code bases with the most comprehensive experimental evaluation (thus far) using 3,788 binaries. Our study yields a comprehensive description and organization of strategies for disassembly, classifying them as either algorithm or else heuristic. Meanwhile, we measure and report the impact of individual algorithms on the results of each tool. We find that while principled algorithms are used by all tools, they still heavily rely on heuristics to increase code coverage. Depending on the heuristics used, different coverage-vs-correctness trade-offs come in play, leading to tools with different strengths and weaknesses. We envision that these findings will help users pick the right tool and assist researchers in improving binary disassembly.