Source author record

Bharath Balasubramanian

Bharath Balasubramanian appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Fault Tolerance in Distributed Systems using Fused State Machines

Replication is a standard technique for fault tolerance in distributed systems modeled as deterministic finite state machines (DFSMs or machines). To correct f crash or f/2 Byzantine faults among n different machines, replication requires nf additional backup machines. We present a solution called fusion that requires just f additional backup machines. First, we build a framework for fault tolerance in DFSMs based on the notion of Hamming distances. We introduce the concept of an (f,m)-fusion, which is a set of m backup machines that can correct f crash faults or f/2 Byzantine faults among a given set of machines. Second, we present an algorithm to generate an (f,f)-fusion for a given set of machines. We ensure that our backups are efficient in terms of the size of their state and event sets. Our evaluation of fusion on the widely used MCNC'91 benchmarks for DFSMs show that the average state space savings in fusion (over replication) is 38% (range 0-99%). To demonstrate the practical use of fusion, we describe its potential application to the MapReduce framework. Using a simple case study, we compare replication and fusion as applied to this framework. While a pure replication-based solution requires 1.8 million map tasks, our fusion-based solution requires only 1.4 million map tasks with minimal overhead during normal operation or recovery. Hence, fusion results in considerable savings in state space and other resources such as the power needed to run the backup tasks.