BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Bernhard Reinke

Bernhard Reinke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.DSmath.GRmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Filament Pairs, Dynamic Partitions, and Spiders for Post-Singularly Finite Entire Functions

Filaments are a natural generalization of the well-known concept of dynamic rays in complex dynamics. In this article we investigate which periodic or preperiodic filaments land together for arbitrary post-singularly finite transcendental entire functions. Our first main result is a combinatorial description of the landing relation of filaments in terms of the dynamic partitions of the space of external addresses. One of the main difficulties deals with taming the more complicated topology of filaments. In the end, filaments possess all the topological properties of dynamic rays that are essential for the construction of dynamic partitions. The results of this paper are the foundation for the development of combinatorial models, in particular homotopy Hubbard trees, for arbitrary post-singularly finite transcendental entire functions. Our second mail result is that every postsingularly finite entire function has an iterated that possesses and invariant spider: spiders are, like homotopy Hubbard trees, an important tool for the combinatorial classification of postsingularly finite polynomials and presumably also for entire functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Amenability of Bounded Automata Groups on Infinite Alphabets

We study the action of groups generated by bounded activity automata with infinite alphabets on their orbital Schreier graphs. We introduce an amenability criterion for such groups based on the recurrence of the first level action. This criterion is a natural extension of the result that all groups generated by bounded activity automata with finite alphabets are amenable. Our motivation comes from the investigation of iterated monodromy groups of entire functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Iterated Monodromy Groups of Exponential Maps

This paper introduces iterated monodromy groups for transcendental functions and discusses them in the simplest setting, for post-singularly finite exponential functions. These groups are self-similar groups in a natural way, based on an explicit construction in terms of kneading sequences. We investigate the group theoretic properties of these groups, and show in particular that they are amenable, but they are not elementary subexponentially amenable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Weierstrass root finder is not generally convergent

Finding roots of univariate polynomials is one of the fundamental tasks of numerics, and there is still a wide gap between root finders that are well understood in theory and those that perform well in practice. We investigate the root finding method of Weierstrass, a root finder that tries to approximate all roots of a given polynomial in parallel (in the Jacobi version, i.e., with parallel updates). This method has a good reputation for finding all roots in practice except in obvious cases of symmetry, but very little is known about its global dynamics and convergence properties. We show that the Weierstrass method, like the well known Newton method, is not generally convergent: there are open sets of polynomials $p$ of every degree $d \ge 3$ such that the dynamics of the Weierstrass method applied to $p$ exhibits attracting periodic orbits. Specifically, all polynomials sufficiently close to $Z^3 + Z + 180$ have attracting cycles of period $4$. Here, period $4$ is minimal: we show that for cubic polynomials, there are no periodic orbits of length $2$ or $3$ that attract open sets of starting points. We also establish another convergence problem for the Weierstrass method: for almost every polynomial of degree $d\ge 3$ there are orbits that are defined for all iterates but converge to $\infty$; this is a problem that does not occur for Newton's method. Our results are obtained by first interpreting the original problem coming from numerical mathematics in terms of higher-dimensional complex dynamics, then phrasing the question in algebraic terms in such a way that we could finally answer it by applying methods from computer algebra.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access