Researcher profile

Barun Gorain

Barun Gorain contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Collaborative Dispersion by Silent Robots

In the dispersion problem, a set of $k$ co-located mobile robots must relocate themselves in distinct nodes of an unknown network. The network is modeled as an anonymous graph $G=(V,E)$, where the nodes of the graph are not labeled. The edges incident to a node $v$ with degree $d$ are labeled with port numbers in the range $0,1, \cdots, d-1$ at $v$. The robots have unique ids in the range $[0,L]$, where $L \ge k$, and are initially placed at a source node $s$. Each robot knows only its own id but does not know the ids of the other robots or the values of $L,k$. The task of dispersion was traditionally achieved with the assumption of two types of communication abilities: (a) when some robots are at the same node, they can communicate by exchanging messages between them (b) any two robots in the network can exchange messages between them. In this paper, we ask whether this ability of communication among co-located robots is necessary to achieve dispersion. We show that even if the ability of communication is not available, the task of dispersion by a set of mobile robots can be achieved in a much weaker model where a robot at a node $v$ has the access of following very restricted information at the beginning of any round: (1) am I alone at $v$? (2) the number of robots at $v$ increased or decreased compare to the previous round? We propose a deterministic algorithm that achieves dispersion on any given graph $G=(V,E)$ in time $O\left( k\log L+k^2 \log Δ\right)$, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree of a node in $G$. Each robot uses $O(\log L+ \log Δ)$ additional memory. We also prove that the task of dispersion cannot be achieved by a set of mobile robots with $o(\log L + \log Δ)$ additional memory.

preprint2022arXiv

Treasure Hunt in Graph using Pebbles

In this paper, we study the treasure hunt problem in a graph by a mobile agent. The nodes in the graph $G=(V,E)$ are anonymous and the edges incident to a vertex $v\in V$ whose degree is $deg(v)$ are labeled arbitrarily as $0,1,\ldots, deg(v)-1$. At a node $t$ in $G$ a stationary object, called {\it treasure} is located. The mobile agent that is initially located at a node $s$ in $G$, the starting point of the agent, must find the treasure by reaching the node $t$. The distance from $s$ to $t$ is $D$. The {\it time} required to find the treasure is the total number of edges the agent visits before it finds the treasure. The agent does not have any prior knowledge about the graph or the position of the treasure. An oracle, that knows the graph, the initial position of the agent, and the position of the treasure, places some pebbles on the nodes, at most one per node, of the graph to guide the agent towards the treasure. This paper aims to study the trade-off between the number of pebbles provided and the time required to find the treasure. To be specific, we aim to answer the following question. ``What is the minimum time for treasure hunt in a graph with maximum degree $Δ$ and diameter $D$ if $k$ pebbles are placed? &#34; We answer the above question when $k<D$ or $k=cD$ for some positive integer $c$. We design efficient algorithms for the agent for different values of $k$. We also propose an almost matching lower bound result for $k<D$.

preprint2020arXiv

Four Shades of Deterministic Leader Election in Anonymous Networks

Leader election is one of the fundamental problems in distributed computing: a single node, called the leader, must be specified. This task can be formulated either in a weak way, where one node outputs &#39;leader&#39; and all other nodes output &#39;non-leader&#39;, or in a strong way, where all nodes must also learn which node is the leader. If the nodes of the network have distinct identifiers, then such an agreement means that all nodes have to output the identifier of the elected leader. For anonymous networks, the strong version of leader election requires that all nodes must be able to find a path to the leader, as this is the only way to identify it. For any network in which leader election (weak or strong) is possible knowing the map of the network, there is a minimum time in which this can be done. We consider four formulations of leader election discussed in the literature in the context of anonymous networks : one is the weak formulation, and the three others specify three different ways of finding the path to the leader in the strong formulation. Our aim is to compare the amount of initial information needed to accomplish each of these &#34;four shades&#34; of leader election in minimum time. We show that the amount of information required to accomplish leader election in the weak formulation in minimum time is exponentially smaller than that needed for any of the strong formulations. Thus, if the required amount of advice is used as a measure of the difficulty of the task, the weakest version of leader election in minimum time is drastically easier than any version of the strong formulation in minimum time.