Researcher profile

Axel Saalbach

Axel Saalbach contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Defending against Reconstruction Attacks through Differentially Private Federated Learning for Classification of Heterogeneous Chest X-Ray Data

Privacy regulations and the physical distribution of heterogeneous data are often primary concerns for the development of deep learning models in a medical context. This paper evaluates the feasibility of differentially private federated learning for chest X-ray classification as a defense against data privacy attacks. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to directly compare the impact of differentially private training on two different neural network architectures, DenseNet121 and ResNet50. Extending the federated learning environments previously analyzed in terms of privacy, we simulated a heterogeneous and imbalanced federated setting by distributing images from the public CheXpert and Mendeley chest X-ray datasets unevenly among 36 clients. Both non-private baseline models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of $0.94$ on the binary classification task of detecting the presence of a medical finding. We demonstrate that both model architectures are vulnerable to privacy violation by applying image reconstruction attacks to local model updates from individual clients. The attack was particularly successful during later training stages. To mitigate the risk of privacy breach, we integrated Rényi differential privacy with a Gaussian noise mechanism into local model training. We evaluate model performance and attack vulnerability for privacy budgets $ε\in$ {1, 3, 6, 10}. The DenseNet121 achieved the best utility-privacy trade-off with an AUC of $0.94$ for $ε$ = 6. Model performance deteriorated slightly for individual clients compared to the non-private baseline. The ResNet50 only reached an AUC of $0.76$ in the same privacy setting. Its performance was inferior to that of the DenseNet121 for all considered privacy constraints, suggesting that the DenseNet121 architecture is more robust to differentially private training.

preprint2020arXiv

Localization of Critical Findings in Chest X-Ray without Local Annotations Using Multi-Instance Learning

The automatic detection of critical findings in chest X-rays (CXR), such as pneumothorax, is important for assisting radiologists in their clinical workflow like triaging time-sensitive cases and screening for incidental findings. While deep learning (DL) models has become a promising predictive technology with near-human accuracy, they commonly suffer from a lack of explainability, which is an important aspect for clinical deployment of DL models in the highly regulated healthcare industry. For example, localizing critical findings in an image is useful for explaining the predictions of DL classification algorithms. While there have been a host of joint classification and localization methods for computer vision, the state-of-the-art DL models require locally annotated training data in the form of pixel level labels or bounding box coordinates. In the medical domain, this requires an expensive amount of manual annotation by medical experts for each critical finding. This requirement becomes a major barrier for training models that can rapidly scale to various findings. In this work, we address these shortcomings with an interpretable DL algorithm based on multi-instance learning that jointly classifies and localizes critical findings in CXR without the need for local annotations. We show competitive classification results on three different critical findings (pneumothorax, pneumonia, and pulmonary edema) from three different CXR datasets.

preprint2020arXiv

Smart Chest X-ray Worklist Prioritization using Artificial Intelligence: A Clinical Workflow Simulation

The aim is to evaluate whether smart worklist prioritization by artificial intelligence (AI) can optimize the radiology workflow and reduce report turnaround times (RTAT) for critical findings in chest radiographs (CXRs). Furthermore, we investigate a method to counteract the effect of false negative predictions by AI -- resulting in an extremely and dangerously long RTAT, as CXRs are sorted to the end of the worklist. We developed a simulation framework that models the current workflow at a university hospital by incorporating hospital specific CXR generation rates, reporting rates and pathology distribution. Using this, we simulated the standard worklist processing &#34;first-in, first-out&#34; (FIFO) and compared it with a worklist prioritization based on urgency. Examination prioritization was performed by the AI, classifying eight different pathological findings ranked in descending order of urgency: pneumothorax, pleural effusion, infiltrate, congestion, atelectasis, cardiomegaly, mass and foreign object. Furthermore, we introduced an upper limit for the maximum waiting time, after which the highest urgency is assigned to the examination. The average RTAT for all critical findings was significantly reduced in all Prioritization-simulations compared to the FIFO-simulation (e.g. pneumothorax: 35.6 min vs. 80.1 min; p $<0.0001$), while the maximum RTAT for most findings increased at the same time (e.g. pneumothorax: 1293 min vs 890 min; p $<0.0001$). Our &#34;upper limit&#34; substantially reduced the maximum RTAT all classes (e.g. pneumothorax: 979 min vs. 1293 min / 1178 min; p $<0.0001$). Our simulations demonstrate that smart worklist prioritization by AI can reduce the average RTAT for critical findings in CXRs while maintaining a small maximum RTAT as FIFO.