Source author record

Axel Finke

Axel Finke appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computation Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2025arXiv

On the limitation of evaluating machine unlearning using only a single training seed

Machine unlearning (MU) aims to remove the influence of certain data points from a trained model without costly retraining. Most practical MU algorithms are only approximate and their performance can only be assessed empirically. Care must therefore be taken to make empirical comparisons as representative as possible. A common practice is to run the MU algorithm multiple times independently starting from the same trained model. In this work, we demonstrate that this practice can give highly non-representative results because -- even for the same architecture and same dataset -- some MU methods can be highly sensitive to the choice of random number seed used for model training. We illustrate that this is particularly relevant for MU methods that are deterministic, i.e., which always produce the same result when started from the same trained model. We therefore recommend that empirical comparisons of MU algorithms should also reflect the variability across different model training seeds.

preprint2018arXiv

Limit theorems for sequential MCMC methods

Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods, also known as particle filters, constitute a class of algorithms used to approximate expectations with respect to a sequence of probability distributions as well as the normalising constants of those distributions. Sequential MCMC methods are an alternative class of techniques addressing similar problems in which particles are sampled according to an MCMC kernel rather than conditionally independently at each time step. These methods were introduced over twenty years ago by Berzuini et al. (1997). Recently, there has been a renewed interest in such algorithms as they demonstrate an empirical performance superior to that of SMC methods in some applications. We establish a strong law of large numbers and a central limit theorem for sequential MCMC methods and provide conditions under which errors can be controlled uniformly in time. In the context of state-space models, we provide conditions under which sequential MCMC methods can indeed outperform standard SMC methods in terms of asymptotic variance of the corresponding Monte Carlo estimators.

preprint2016arXiv

On embedded hidden Markov models and particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods

The embedded hidden Markov model (EHMM) sampling method is a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique for state inference in non-linear non-Gaussian state-space models which was proposed in Neal (2003); Neal et al. (2004) and extended in Shestopaloff and Neal (2016). An extension to Bayesian parameter inference was presented in Shestopaloff and Neal (2013). An alternative class of MCMC schemes addressing similar inference problems is provided by particle MCMC (PMCMC) methods (Andrieu et al. 2009; 2010). All these methods rely on the introduction of artificial extended target distributions for multiple state sequences which, by construction, are such that one randomly indexed sequence is distributed according to the posterior of interest. By adapting the Metropolis-Hastings algorithms developed in the framework of PMCMC methods to the EHMM framework, we obtain novel particle filter (PF)-type algorithms for state inference and novel MCMC schemes for parameter and state inference. In addition, we show that most of these algorithms can be viewed as particular cases of a general PF and PMCMC framework. We compare the empirical performance of the various algorithms on low- to high-dimensional state-space models. We demonstrate that a properly tuned conditional PF with "local" MCMC moves proposed in Shestopaloff and Neal (2016) can outperform the standard conditional PF significantly when applied to high-dimensional state-space models while the novel PF-type algorithm could prove to be an interesting alternative to standard PFs for likelihood estimation in some lower-dimensional scenarios.