BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Ashwin Machanavajjhala

Ashwin Machanavajjhala appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
DatabasesCryptography and SecurityData Structures and AlgorithmsSocial and Information NetworksApplicationscs.CYecon.EMInformation RetrievalMachine LearningMethodologyphysics.soc-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

23works
11topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

23 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Bayesian and Frequentist Semantics for Common Variations of Differential Privacy: Applications to the 2020 Census

The purpose of this paper is to guide interpretation of the semantic privacy guarantees for some of the major variations of differential privacy, which include pure, approximate, Rényi, zero-concentrated, and $f$ differential privacy. We interpret privacy-loss accounting parameters, frequentist semantics, and Bayesian semantics (including new results). The driving application is the interpretation of the confidentiality protections for the 2020 Census Public Law 94-171 Redistricting Data Summary File released August 12, 2021, which, for the first time, were produced with formal privacy guarantees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Benchmarking Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation Algorithms

This work presents a systematic benchmark of differentially private synthetic data generation algorithms that can generate tabular data. Utility of the synthetic data is evaluated by measuring whether the synthetic data preserve the distribution of individual and pairs of attributes, pairwise correlation as well as on the accuracy of an ML classification model. In a comprehensive empirical evaluation we identify the top performing algorithms and those that consistently fail to beat baseline approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

DPXPlain: Privately Explaining Aggregate Query Answers

Differential privacy (DP) is the state-of-the-art and rigorous notion of privacy for answering aggregate database queries while preserving the privacy of sensitive information in the data. In today's era of data analysis, however, it poses new challenges for users to understand the trends and anomalies observed in the query results: Is the unexpected answer due to the data itself, or is it due to the extra noise that must be added to preserve DP? In the second case, even the observation made by the users on query results may be wrong. In the first case, can we still mine interesting explanations from the sensitive data while protecting its privacy? To address these challenges, we present a three-phase framework DPXPlain, which is the first system to the best of our knowledge for explaining group-by aggregate query answers with DP. In its three phases, DPXPlain (a) answers a group-by aggregate query with DP, (b) allows users to compare aggregate values of two groups and with high probability assesses whether this comparison holds or is flipped by the DP noise, and (c) eventually provides an explanation table containing the approximately `top-k' explanation predicates along with their relative influences and ranks in the form of confidence intervals, while guaranteeing DP in all steps. We perform an extensive experimental analysis of DPXPlain with multiple use-cases on real and synthetic data showing that DPXPlain efficiently provides insightful explanations with good accuracy and utility.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

IncShrink: Architecting Efficient Outsourced Databases using Incremental MPC and Differential Privacy

In this paper, we consider secure outsourced growing databases that support view-based query answering. These databases allow untrusted servers to privately maintain a materialized view, such that they can use only the materialized view to process query requests instead of accessing the original data from which the view was derived. To tackle this, we devise a novel view-based secure outsourced growing database framework, Incshrink. The key features of this solution are: (i) Incshrink maintains the view using incremental MPC operators which eliminates the need for a trusted third party upfront, and (ii) to ensure high performance, Incshrink guarantees that the leakage satisfies DP in the presence of updates. To the best of our knowledge, there are no existing systems that have these properties. We demonstrate Incshrink's practical feasibility in terms of efficiency and accuracy with extensive empirical evaluations on real-world datasets and the TPC-ds benchmark. The evaluation results show that Incshrink provides a 3-way trade-off in terms of privacy, accuracy, and efficiency guarantees, and offers at least a 7,800 times performance advantage over standard secure outsourced databases that do not support the view-based query paradigm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System TopDown Algorithm

The Census TopDown Algorithm (TDA) is a disclosure avoidance system using differential privacy for privacy-loss accounting. The algorithm ingests the final, edited version of the 2020 Census data and the final tabulation geographic definitions. The algorithm then creates noisy versions of key queries on the data, referred to as measurements, using zero-Concentrated Differential Privacy. Another key aspect of the TDA are invariants, statistics that the Census Bureau has determined, as matter of policy, to exclude from the privacy-loss accounting. The TDA post-processes the measurements together with the invariants to produce a Microdata Detail File (MDF) that contains one record for each person and one record for each housing unit enumerated in the 2020 Census. The MDF is passed to the 2020 Census tabulation system to produce the 2020 Census Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File. This paper describes the mathematics and testing of the TDA for this purpose.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Computing Local Sensitivities of Counting Queries with Joins

Local sensitivity of a query Q given a database instance D, i.e. how much the output Q(D) changes when a tuple is added to D or deleted from D, has many applications including query analysis, outlier detection, and in differential privacy. However, it is NP-hard to find local sensitivity of a conjunctive query in terms of the size of the query, even for the class of acyclic queries. Although the complexity is polynomial when the query size is fixed, the naive algorithms are not efficient for large databases and queries involving multiple joins. In this paper, we present a novel approach to compute local sensitivity of counting queries involving join operations by tracking and summarizing tuple sensitivities -- the maximum change a tuple can cause in the query result when it is added or removed. We give algorithms for the sensitivity problem for full acyclic join queries using join trees, that run in polynomial time in both the size of the database and query for an interesting sub-class of queries, which we call 'doubly acyclic queries' that include path queries, and in polynomial time in combined complexity when the maximum degree in the join tree is bounded. Our algorithms can be extended to certain non-acyclic queries using generalized hypertree decompositions. We evaluate our approach experimentally, and show applications of our algorithms to obtain better results for differential privacy by orders of magnitude.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Crypt$ε$: Crypto-Assisted Differential Privacy on Untrusted Servers

Differential privacy (DP) has steadily become the de-facto standard for achieving privacy in data analysis, which is typically implemented either in the "central" or "local" model. The local model has been more popular for commercial deployments as it does not require a trusted data collector. This increased privacy, however, comes at a cost of utility and algorithmic expressibility as compared to the central model. In this work, we propose, Crypt$ε$, a system and programming framework that (1) achieves the accuracy guarantees and algorithmic expressibility of the central model (2) without any trusted data collector like in the local model. Crypt$ε$ achieves the "best of both worlds" by employing two non-colluding untrusted servers that run DP programs on encrypted data from the data owners. Although straightforward implementations of DP programs using secure computation tools can achieve the above goal theoretically, in practice they are beset with many challenges such as poor performance and tricky security proofs. To this end, Crypt$ε$ allows data analysts to author logical DP programs that are automatically translated to secure protocols that work on encrypted data. These protocols ensure that the untrusted servers learn nothing more than the noisy outputs, thereby guaranteeing DP (for computationally bounded adversaries) for all Crypt$ε$ programs. Crypt$ε$ supports a rich class of DP programs that can be expressed via a small set of transformation and measurement operators followed by arbitrary post-processing. Further, we propose performance optimizations leveraging the fact that the output is noisy. We demonstrate Crypt$ε$'s feasibility for practical DP analysis with extensive empirical evaluations on real datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

DP-Cryptography: Marrying Differential Privacy and Cryptography in Emerging Applications

Differential privacy (DP) has arisen as the state-of-the-art metric for quantifying individual privacy when sensitive data are analyzed, and it is starting to see practical deployment in organizations such as the US Census Bureau, Apple, Google, etc. There are two popular models for deploying differential privacy - standard differential privacy (SDP), where a trusted server aggregates all the data and runs the DP mechanisms, and local differential privacy (LDP), where each user perturbs their own data and perturbed data is analyzed. Due to security concerns arising from aggregating raw data at a single server, several real world deployments in industry have embraced the LDP model. However, systems based on the LDP model tend to have poor utility - "a gap" in the utility achieved as compared to systems based on the SDP model. In this work, we survey and synthesize emerging directions of research at the intersection of differential privacy and cryptography. First, we survey solutions that combine cryptographic primitives like secure computation and anonymous communication with differential privacy to give alternatives to the LDP model that avoid a trusted server as in SDP but close the gap in accuracy. These primitives introduce performance bottlenecks and necessitate efficient alternatives. Second, we synthesize work in an area we call "DP-Cryptography" - cryptographic primitives that are allowed to leak differentially private outputs. These primitives have orders of magnitude better performance than standard cryptographic primitives. DP-cryptographic primitives are perfectly suited for implementing alternatives to LDP, but are also applicable to scenarios where standard cryptographic primitives do not have practical implementations. Through this unique lens of research taxonomy, we survey ongoing research in these directions while also providing novel directions for future research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Data

Data collected about individuals is regularly used to make decisions that impact those same individuals. We consider settings where sensitive personal data is used to decide who will receive resources or benefits. While it is well known that there is a tradeoff between protecting privacy and the accuracy of decisions, we initiate a first-of-its-kind study into the impact of formally private mechanisms (based on differential privacy) on fair and equitable decision-making. We empirically investigate novel tradeoffs on two real-world decisions made using U.S. Census data (allocation of federal funds and assignment of voting rights benefits) as well as a classic apportionment problem. Our results show that if decisions are made using an $ε$-differentially private version of the data, under strict privacy constraints (smaller $ε$), the noise added to achieve privacy may disproportionately impact some groups over others. We propose novel measures of fairness in the context of randomized differentially private algorithms and identify a range of causes of outcome disparities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Privacy-Preserving Data Analysis for the Federal Statistical Agencies

Government statistical agencies collect enormously valuable data on the nation's population and business activities. Wide access to these data enables evidence-based policy making, supports new research that improves society, facilitates training for students in data science, and provides resources for the public to better understand and participate in their society. These data also affect the private sector. For example, the Employment Situation in the United States, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, moves markets. Nonetheless, government agencies are under increasing pressure to limit access to data because of a growing understanding of the threats to data privacy and confidentiality. "De-identification" - stripping obvious identifiers like names, addresses, and identification numbers - has been found inadequate in the face of modern computational and informational resources. Unfortunately, the problem extends even to the release of aggregate data statistics. This counter-intuitive phenomenon has come to be known as the Fundamental Law of Information Recovery. It says that overly accurate estimates of too many statistics can completely destroy privacy. One may think of this as death by a thousand cuts. Every statistic computed from a data set leaks a small amount of information about each member of the data set - a tiny cut. This is true even if the exact value of the statistic is distorted a bit in order to preserve privacy. But while each statistical release is an almost harmless little cut in terms of privacy risk for any individual, the cumulative effect can be to completely compromise the privacy of some individuals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Design of Policy-Aware Differentially Private Algorithms

The problem of designing error optimal differentially private algorithms is well studied. Recent work applying differential privacy to real world settings have used variants of differential privacy that appropriately modify the notion of neighboring databases. The problem of designing error optimal algorithms for such variants of differential privacy is open. In this paper, we show a novel transformational equivalence result that can turn the problem of query answering under differential privacy with a modified notion of neighbors to one of query answering under standard differential privacy, for a large class of neighbor definitions. We utilize the Blowfish privacy framework that generalizes differential privacy. Blowfish uses a {\em policy graph} to instantiate different notions of neighboring databases. We show that the error incurred when answering a workload $\mathbf{W}$ on a database $\mathbf{x}$ under a Blowfish policy graph $G$ is identical to the error required to answer a transformed workload $f_G(\mathbf{W})$ on database $g_G(\mathbf{x})$ under standard differential privacy, where $f_G$ and $g_G$ are linear transformations based on $G$. Using this result, we develop error efficient algorithms for releasing histograms and multidimensional range queries under different Blowfish policies. We believe the tools we develop will be useful for finding mechanisms to answer many other classes of queries with low error under other policy graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the Privacy Properties of Variants on the Sparse Vector Technique

The sparse vector technique is a powerful differentially private primitive that allows an analyst to check whether queries in a stream are greater or lesser than a threshold. This technique has a unique property -- the algorithm works by adding noise with a finite variance to the queries and the threshold, and guarantees privacy that only degrades with (a) the maximum sensitivity of any one query in stream, and (b) the number of positive answers output by the algorithm. Recent work has developed variants of this algorithm, which we call {\em generalized private threshold testing}, and are claimed to have privacy guarantees that do not depend on the number of positive or negative answers output by the algorithm. These algorithms result in a significant improvement in utility over the sparse vector technique for a given privacy budget, and have found applications in frequent itemset mining, feature selection in machine learning and generating synthetic data. In this paper we critically analyze the privacy properties of generalized private threshold testing. We show that generalized private threshold testing does not satisfy ε-differential privacy for any finite ε. We identify a subtle error in the privacy analysis of this technique in prior work. Moreover, we show an adversary can use generalized private threshold testing to recover counts from the datasets (especially small counts) exactly with high accuracy, and thus can result in individuals being reidentified. We demonstrate our attacks empirically on real datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Principled Evaluation of Differentially Private Algorithms using DPBench

Differential privacy has become the dominant standard in the research community for strong privacy protection. There has been a flood of research into query answering algorithms that meet this standard. Algorithms are becoming increasingly complex, and in particular, the performance of many emerging algorithms is {\em data dependent}, meaning the distribution of the noise added to query answers may change depending on the input data. Theoretical analysis typically only considers the worst case, making empirical study of average case performance increasingly important. In this paper we propose a set of evaluation principles which we argue are essential for sound evaluation. Based on these principles we propose DPBench, a novel evaluation framework for standardized evaluation of privacy algorithms. We then apply our benchmark to evaluate algorithms for answering 1- and 2-dimensional range queries. The result is a thorough empirical study of 15 published algorithms on a total of 27 datasets that offers new insights into algorithm behavior---in particular the influence of dataset scale and shape---and a more complete characterization of the state of the art. Our methodology is able to resolve inconsistencies in prior empirical studies and place algorithm performance in context through comparison to simple baselines. Finally, we pose open research questions which we hope will guide future algorithm design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Blowfish Privacy: Tuning Privacy-Utility Trade-offs using Policies

Privacy definitions provide ways for trading-off the privacy of individuals in a statistical database for the utility of downstream analysis of the data. In this paper, we present Blowfish, a class of privacy definitions inspired by the Pufferfish framework, that provides a rich interface for this trade-off. In particular, we allow data publishers to extend differential privacy using a policy, which specifies (a) secrets, or information that must be kept secret, and (b) constraints that may be known about the data. While the secret specification allows increased utility by lessening protection for certain individual properties, the constraint specification provides added protection against an adversary who knows correlations in the data (arising from constraints). We formalize policies and present novel algorithms that can handle general specifications of sensitive information and certain count constraints. We show that there are reasonable policies under which our privacy mechanisms for k-means clustering, histograms and range queries introduce significantly lesser noise than their differentially private counterparts. We quantify the privacy-utility trade-offs for various policies analytically and empirically on real datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Differentially Private Algorithms for Empirical Machine Learning

An important use of private data is to build machine learning classifiers. While there is a burgeoning literature on differentially private classification algorithms, we find that they are not practical in real applications due to two reasons. First, existing differentially private classifiers provide poor accuracy on real world datasets. Second, there is no known differentially private algorithm for empirically evaluating the private classifier on a private test dataset. In this paper, we develop differentially private algorithms that mirror real world empirical machine learning workflows. We consider the private classifier training algorithm as a blackbox. We present private algorithms for selecting features that are input to the classifier. Though adding a preprocessing step takes away some of the privacy budget from the actual classification process (thus potentially making it noisier and less accurate), we show that our novel preprocessing techniques significantly increase classifier accuracy on three real-world datasets. We also present the first private algorithms for empirically constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves on a private test set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On Sharing Private Data with Multiple Non-Colluding Adversaries

We present SPARSI, a theoretical framework for partitioning sensitive data across multiple non-colluding adversaries. Most work in privacy-aware data sharing has considered disclosing summaries where the aggregate information about the data is preserved, but sensitive user information is protected. Nonetheless, there are applications, including online advertising, cloud computing and crowdsourcing markets, where detailed and fine-grained user-data must be disclosed. We consider a new data sharing paradigm and introduce the problem of privacy-aware data partitioning, where a sensitive dataset must be partitioned among k untrusted parties (adversaries). The goal is to maximize the utility derived by partitioning and distributing the dataset, while minimizing the amount of sensitive information disclosed. The data should be distributed so that an adversary, without colluding with other adversaries, cannot draw additional inferences about the private information, by linking together multiple pieces of information released to her. The assumption of no collusion is both reasonable and necessary in the above application domains that require release of private user information. SPARSI enables us to formally define privacy-aware data partitioning using the notion of sensitive properties for modeling private information and a hypergraph representation for describing the interdependencies between data entries and private information. We show that solving privacy-aware partitioning is, in general, NP-hard, but for specific information disclosure functions, good approximate solutions can be found using relaxation techniques. Finally, we present a local search algorithm applicable to generic information disclosure functions. We apply SPARSI together with the proposed algorithms on data from a real advertising scenario and show that we can partition data with no disclosure to any single advertiser.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

An Analysis of Structured Data on the Web

In this paper, we analyze the nature and distribution of structured data on the Web. Web-scale information extraction, or the problem of creating structured tables using extraction from the entire web, is gathering lots of research interest. We perform a study to understand and quantify the value of Web-scale extraction, and how structured information is distributed amongst top aggregator websites and tail sites for various interesting domains. We believe this is the first study of its kind, and gives us new insights for information extraction over the Web.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Finding Connected Components on Map-reduce in Logarithmic Rounds

Given a large graph G = (V,E) with millions of nodes and edges, how do we compute its connected components efficiently? Recent work addresses this problem in map-reduce, where a fundamental trade-off exists between the number of map-reduce rounds and the communication of each round. Denoting d the diameter of the graph, and n the number of nodes in the largest component, all prior map-reduce techniques either require d rounds, or require about n|V| + |E| communication per round. We propose two randomized map-reduce algorithms -- (i) Hash-Greater-To-Min, which provably requires at most 3log(n) rounds with high probability, and at most 2(|V| + |E|) communication per round, and (ii) Hash-to-Min, which has a worse theoretical complexity, but in practice completes in at most 2log(d) rounds and 3(|V| + |E|) communication per rounds. Our techniques for connected components can be applied to clustering as well. We propose a novel algorithm for agglomerative single linkage clustering in map-reduce. This is the first algorithm that can provably compute a clustering in at most O(log(n)) rounds, where n is the size of the largest cluster. We show the effectiveness of all our algorithms through detailed experiments on large synthetic as well as real-world datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Scalable Social Coordination using Enmeshed Queries

Social coordination allows users to move beyond awareness of their friends to efficiently coordinating physical activities with others. While specific forms of social coordination can be seen in tools such as Evite, Meetup and Groupon, we introduce a more general model using what we call enmeshed queries. An enmeshed query allows users to declaratively specify an intent to coordinate by specifying social attributes such as the desired group size and who/what/when, and the database returns matching queries. Enmeshed queries are continuous, but new queries (and not data) answer older queries; the variable group size also makes enmeshed queries different from entangled queries, publish-subscribe systems, and dating services. We show that even offline group coordination using enmeshed queries is NP-hard. We then introduce efficient heuristics that use selective indices such as location and time to reduce the space of possible matches; we also add refinements such as delayed evaluation and using the relative matchability of users to determine search order. We describe a centralized implementation and evaluate its performance against an optimal algorithm. We show that the combination of not stopping prematurely (after finding a match) and delayed evaluation results in an algorithm that finds 86% of the matches found by an optimal algorithm, and takes an average of 40 usec per query using 1 core of a 2.5 Ghz server machine. Further, the algorithm has good latency, is reasonably fair to large group size requests, and can be scaled to global workloads using multiple cores and multiple servers. We conclude by describing potential generalizations that add prices, recommendations, and data mining to basic enmeshed queries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

CBLOCK: An Automatic Blocking Mechanism for Large-Scale De-duplication Tasks

De-duplication---identification of distinct records referring to the same real-world entity---is a well-known challenge in data integration. Since very large datasets prohibit the comparison of every pair of records, {\em blocking} has been identified as a technique of dividing the dataset for pairwise comparisons, thereby trading off {\em recall} of identified duplicates for {\em efficiency}. Traditional de-duplication tasks, while challenging, typically involved a fixed schema such as Census data or medical records. However, with the presence of large, diverse sets of structured data on the web and the need to organize it effectively on content portals, de-duplication systems need to scale in a new dimension to handle a large number of schemas, tasks and data sets, while handling ever larger problem sizes. In addition, when working in a map-reduce framework it is important that canopy formation be implemented as a {\em hash function}, making the canopy design problem more challenging. We present CBLOCK, a system that addresses these challenges. CBLOCK learns hash functions automatically from attribute domains and a labeled dataset consisting of duplicates. Subsequently, CBLOCK expresses blocking functions using a hierarchical tree structure composed of atomic hash functions. The application may guide the automated blocking process based on architectural constraints, such as by specifying a maximum size of each block (based on memory requirements), impose disjointness of blocks (in a grid environment), or specify a particular objective function trading off recall for efficiency. As a post-processing step to automatically generated blocks, CBLOCK {\em rolls-up} smaller blocks to increase recall. We present experimental results on two large-scale de-duplication datasets at Yahoo!---consisting of over 140K movies and 40K restaurants respectively---and demonstrate the utility of CBLOCK.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Personalized Social Recommendations - Accurate or Private?

With the recent surge of social networks like Facebook, new forms of recommendations have become possible - personalized recommendations of ads, content, and even new friend and product connections based on one's social interactions. Since recommendations may use sensitive social information, it is speculated that these recommendations are associated with privacy risks. The main contribution of this work is in formalizing these expected trade-offs between the accuracy and privacy of personalized social recommendations. In this paper, we study whether "social recommendations", or recommendations that are solely based on a user's social network, can be made without disclosing sensitive links in the social graph. More precisely, we quantify the loss in utility when existing recommendation algorithms are modified to satisfy a strong notion of privacy, called differential privacy. We prove lower bounds on the minimum loss in utility for any recommendation algorithm that is differentially private. We adapt two privacy preserving algorithms from the differential privacy literature to the problem of social recommendations, and analyze their performance in comparison to the lower bounds, both analytically and experimentally. We show that good private social recommendations are feasible only for a small subset of the users in the social network or for a lenient setting of privacy parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Privacy in Search Logs

Search engine companies collect the "database of intentions", the histories of their users' search queries. These search logs are a gold mine for researchers. Search engine companies, however, are wary of publishing search logs in order not to disclose sensitive information. In this paper we analyze algorithms for publishing frequent keywords, queries and clicks of a search log. We first show how methods that achieve variants of $k$-anonymity are vulnerable to active attacks. We then demonstrate that the stronger guarantee ensured by $ε$-differential privacy unfortunately does not provide any utility for this problem. We then propose an algorithm ZEALOUS and show how to set its parameters to achieve $(ε,δ)$-probabilistic privacy. We also contrast our analysis of ZEALOUS with an analysis by Korolova et al. [17] that achieves $(ε',δ')$-indistinguishability. Our paper concludes with a large experimental study using real applications where we compare ZEALOUS and previous work that achieves $k$-anonymity in search log publishing. Our results show that ZEALOUS yields comparable utility to $k-$anonymity while at the same time achieving much stronger privacy guarantees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

On the (Im)possibility of Preserving Utility and Privacy in Personalized Social Recommendations

With the recent surge of social networks like Facebook, new forms of recommendations have become possible -- personalized recommendations of ads, content, and even new social and product connections based on one's social interactions. In this paper, we study whether "social recommendations", or recommendations that utilize a user's social network, can be made without disclosing sensitive links between users. More precisely, we quantify the loss in utility when existing recommendation algorithms are modified to satisfy a strong notion of privacy called differential privacy. We propose lower bounds on the minimum loss in utility for any recommendation algorithm that is differentially private. We also propose two recommendation algorithms that satisfy differential privacy, analyze their performance in comparison to the lower bound, both analytically and experimentally, and show that good private social recommendations are feasible only for a few users in the social network or for a lenient setting of privacy parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access