BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Artem Kotelskiy appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
In previous work we introduced a Khovanov multicurve invariant $\operatorname{\widetilde{Kh}}$ associated with Conway tangles. Applying ideas from homological mirror symmetry we show that $\operatorname{\widetilde{Kh}}$ is subject to strong geography restrictions: Every component of the invariant is linear, in the sense that it admits a lift to a curve homotopic to a straight line in an appropriate planar cover of the tangle boundary.
We compare two different types of mapping class invariants: the Hochschild homology of an $A_\infty$ bimodule coming from bordered Heegaard Floer homology, and fixed point Floer cohomology. We first compute the bimodule invariants and their Hochschild homology in the genus two case. We then compare the resulting computations to fixed point Floer cohomology, and make a conjecture that the two invariants are isomorphic. We also discuss a construction of a map potentially giving the isomorphism. It comes as an open-closed map in the context of a surface being viewed as a $0$-dimensional Lefschetz fibration over the complex plane.
Given a pointed 4-ended tangle $T \subset D^3$, there are two Khovanov theoretic tangle invariants, $\unicode{1044}_1(T)$ from [arXiv:1910.1458] and $L_T$ from [arXiv:1808.06957], which are twisted complexes over the Fukaya category of the boundary 4-punctured sphere $(S^2,4\text{pt})=\partial (D^3, T)$. We prove that these two invariants are the same.