BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Arnab Sarker

Arnab Sarker contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsMachine Learningeess.SYmath.OCSystems and Controlecon.EMPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Accurate Parameter Estimation for Risk-aware Autonomous Systems

Analysis and synthesis of safety-critical autonomous systems are carried out using models which are often dynamic. Two central features of these dynamic systems are parameters and unmodeled dynamics. This paper addresses the use of a spectral lines-based approach for estimating parameters of the dynamic model of an autonomous system. Existing literature has treated all unmodeled components of the dynamic system as sub-Gaussian noise and proposed parameter estimation using Gaussian noise-based exogenous signals. In contrast, we allow the unmodeled part to have deterministic unmodeled dynamics, which are almost always present in physical systems, in addition to sub-Gaussian noise. In addition, we propose a deterministic construction of the exogenous signal in order to carry out parameter estimation. We introduce a new tool kit which employs the theory of spectral lines, retains the stochastic setting, and leads to non-asymptotic bounds on the parameter estimation error. Unlike the existing stochastic approach, these bounds are tunable through an optimal choice of the spectrum of the exogenous signal leading to accurate parameter estimation. We also show that this estimation is robust to unmodeled dynamics, a property that is not assured by the existing approach. Finally, we show that under ideal conditions with no unmodeled dynamics, the proposed approach can ensure a $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret, matching existing literature. Experiments are provided to support all theoretical derivations, which show that the spectral lines-based approach outperforms the Gaussian noise-based method when unmodeled dynamics are present, in terms of both parameter estimation error and Regret obtained using the parameter estimates with a Linear Quadratic Regulator in feedback.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Current Implicit Policies May Not Eradicate COVID-19

Successful predictive modeling of epidemics requires an understanding of the implicit feedback control strategies which are implemented by populations to modulate the spread of contagion. While this task of capturing endogenous behavior can be achieved through intricate modeling assumptions, we find that a population's reaction to case counts can be described through a second order affine dynamical system with linear control which fits well to the data across different regions and times throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The model fits the data well both in and out of sample across the 50 states of the United States, with comparable $R^2$ scores to state of the art ensemble predictions. In contrast to recent models of epidemics, rather than assuming that individuals directly control the contact rate which governs the spread of disease, we assume that individuals control the rate at which they vary their number of interactions, i.e. they control the derivative of the contact rate. We propose an implicit feedback law for this control input and verify that it correlates with policies taken throughout the pandemic. A key takeaway of the dynamical model is that the "stable" point of case counts is non-zero, i.e. COVID-19 will not be eradicated under the current collection of policies and strategies, and additional policies are needed to fully eradicate it quickly. Hence, we suggest alternative implicit policies which focus on making interventions (such as vaccinations and mobility restrictions) a function of cumulative case counts, for which our results suggest a better possibility of eradicating COVID-19.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Unifying Epidemic Models with Mixtures

The COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized the need for a robust understanding of epidemic models. Current models of epidemics are classified as either mechanistic or non-mechanistic: mechanistic models make explicit assumptions on the dynamics of disease, whereas non-mechanistic models make assumptions on the form of observed time series. Here, we introduce a simple mixture-based model which bridges the two approaches while retaining benefits of both. The model represents time series of cases and fatalities as a mixture of Gaussian curves, providing a flexible function class to learn from data compared to traditional mechanistic models. Although the model is non-mechanistic, we show that it arises as the natural outcome of a stochastic process based on a networked SIR framework. This allows learned parameters to take on a more meaningful interpretation compared to similar non-mechanistic models, and we validate the interpretations using auxiliary mobility data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. We provide a simple learning algorithm to identify model parameters and establish theoretical results which show the model can be efficiently learned from data. Empirically, we find the model to have low prediction error. The model is available live at covidpredictions.mit.edu. Ultimately, this allows us to systematically understand the impacts of interventions on COVID-19, which is critical in developing data-driven solutions to controlling epidemics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Two Burning Questions on COVID-19: Did shutting down the economy help? Can we (partially) reopen the economy without risking the second wave?

As we reach the apex of the COVID-19 pandemic, the most pressing question facing us is: can we even partially reopen the economy without risking a second wave? We first need to understand if shutting down the economy helped. And if it did, is it possible to achieve similar gains in the war against the pandemic while partially opening up the economy? To do so, it is critical to understand the effects of the various interventions that can be put into place and their corresponding health and economic implications. Since many interventions exist, the key challenge facing policy makers is understanding the potential trade-offs between them, and choosing the particular set of interventions that works best for their circumstance. In this memo, we provide an overview of Synthetic Interventions (a natural generalization of Synthetic Control), a data-driven and statistically principled method to perform what-if scenario planning, i.e., for policy makers to understand the trade-offs between different interventions before having to actually enact them. In essence, the method leverages information from different interventions that have already been enacted across the world and fits it to a policy maker's setting of interest, e.g., to estimate the effect of mobility-restricting interventions on the U.S., we use daily death data from countries that enforced severe mobility restrictions to create a "synthetic low mobility U.S." and predict the counterfactual trajectory of the U.S. if it had indeed applied a similar intervention. Using Synthetic Interventions, we find that lifting severe mobility restrictions and only retaining moderate mobility restrictions (at retail and transit locations), seems to effectively flatten the curve. We hope this provides guidance on weighing the trade-offs between the safety of the population, strain on the healthcare system, and impact on the economy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access