BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Arjun Roy

Arjun Roy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligencecs.CYcond-mat.stat-mecheess.SYphysics.app-phSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Damage Rate Laws and Failure Statistics for Lumped Coupled-Field Systems via Averaging

We study the non-linear dynamics and failure statistics of a coupled-field fatigue damage evolution model. We develop a methodology to derive averaged damage evolution rate laws from such models. We show that such rate laws reduce life-cycle simulation times by orders of magnitude and permit dynamical systems analysis of long-time behavior, including failure time statistics. We use the averaged damage rate laws to study 1 DOF and 2 DOF damage evolution models. We identify parameter regimes in which the systems behave like a brittle material and show that the relative variability for failure times is high for such cases. We also use the averaged rate laws to construct damage evolution phase portraits for the 2 DOF system and use insights derived from them to understand failure time and location statistics. We show that, for brittle materials, as the relative variability in failure time increases, the variability in failure location decreases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learning

As decision-making increasingly relies on Machine Learning (ML) and (big) data, the issue of fairness in data-driven Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems is receiving increasing attention from both research and industry. A large variety of fairness-aware machine learning solutions have been proposed which involve fairness-related interventions in the data, learning algorithms and/or model outputs. However, a vital part of proposing new approaches is evaluating them empirically on benchmark datasets that represent realistic and diverse settings. Therefore, in this paper, we overview real-world datasets used for fairness-aware machine learning. We focus on tabular data as the most common data representation for fairness-aware machine learning. We start our analysis by identifying relationships between the different attributes, particularly w.r.t. protected attributes and class attribute, using a Bayesian network. For a deeper understanding of bias in the datasets, we investigate the interesting relationships using exploratory analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Learning to Teach Fairness-aware Deep Multi-task Learning

Fairness-aware learning mainly focuses on single task learning (STL). The fairness implications of multi-task learning (MTL) have only recently been considered and a seminal approach has been proposed that considers the fairness-accuracy trade-off for each task and the performance trade-off among different tasks. Instead of a rigid fairness-accuracy trade-off formulation, we propose a flexible approach that learns how to be fair in a MTL setting by selecting which objective (accuracy or fairness) to optimize at each step. We introduce the L2T-FMT algorithm that is a teacher-student network trained collaboratively; the student learns to solve the fair MTL problem while the teacher instructs the student to learn from either accuracy or fairness, depending on what is harder to learn for each task. Moreover, this dynamic selection of which objective to use at each step for each task reduces the number of trade-off weights from 2T to T, where T is the number of tasks. Our experiments on three real datasets show that L2T-FMT improves on both fairness (12-19%) and accuracy (up to 2%) over state-of-the-art approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Multi-fairness under class-imbalance

Recent studies showed that datasets used in fairness-aware machine learning for multiple protected attributes (referred to as multi-discrimination hereafter) are often imbalanced. The class-imbalance problem is more severe for the often underrepresented protected group (e.g. female, non-white, etc.) in the critical minority class. Still, existing methods focus only on the overall error-discrimination trade-off, ignoring the imbalance problem, thus amplifying the prevalent bias in the minority classes. Therefore, solutions are needed to solve the combined problem of multi-discrimination and class-imbalance. To this end, we introduce a new fairness measure, Multi-Max Mistreatment (MMM), which considers both (multi-attribute) protected group and class membership of instances to measure discrimination. To solve the combined problem, we propose a boosting approach that incorporates MMM-costs in the distribution update and post-training selects the optimal trade-off among accurate, balanced, and fair solutions. The experimental results show the superiority of our approach against state-of-the-art methods in producing the best balanced performance across groups and classes and the best accuracy for the protected groups in the minority class.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Parity-based Cumulative Fairness-aware Boosting

Data-driven AI systems can lead to discrimination on the basis of protected attributes like gender or race. One reason for this behavior is the encoded societal biases in the training data (e.g., females are underrepresented), which is aggravated in the presence of unbalanced class distributions (e.g., "granted" is the minority class). State-of-the-art fairness-aware machine learning approaches focus on preserving the \emph{overall} classification accuracy while improving fairness. In the presence of class-imbalance, such methods may further aggravate the problem of discrimination by denying an already underrepresented group (e.g., \textit{females}) the fundamental rights of equal social privileges (e.g., equal credit opportunity). To this end, we propose AdaFair, a fairness-aware boosting ensemble that changes the data distribution at each round, taking into account not only the class errors but also the fairness-related performance of the model defined cumulatively based on the partial ensemble. Except for the in-training boosting of the group discriminated over each round, AdaFair directly tackles imbalance during the post-training phase by optimizing the number of ensemble learners for balanced error performance (BER). AdaFair can facilitate different parity-based fairness notions and mitigate effectively discriminatory outcomes. Our experiments show that our approach can achieve parity in terms of statistical parity, equal opportunity, and disparate mistreatment while maintaining good predictive performance for all classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access