BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Arash Sarshar

Arash Sarshar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical AnalysisMachine Learningmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Meta-learning Formulation of the Autoencoder Problem for Non-linear Dimensionality Reduction

A rapidly growing area of research is the use of machine learning approaches such as autoencoders for dimensionality reduction of data and models in scientific applications. We show that the canonical formulation of autoencoders suffers from several deficiencies that can hinder their performance. Using a meta-learning approach, we reformulate the autoencoder problem as a bi-level optimization procedure that explicitly solves the dimensionality reduction task. We prove that the new formulation corrects the identified deficiencies with canonical autoencoders, provide a practical way to solve it, and showcase the strength of this formulation with a simple numerical illustration.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Physics-informed neural networks for PDE-constrained optimization and control

A fundamental problem in science and engineering is designing optimal control policies that steer a given system towards a desired outcome. This work proposes Control Physics-Informed Neural Networks (Control PINNs) that simultaneously solve for a given system state, and for the optimal control signal, in a one-stage framework that conforms to the underlying physical laws. Prior approaches use a two-stage framework that first models and then controls a system in sequential order. In contrast, a Control PINN incorporates the required optimality conditions in its architecture and in its loss function. The success of Control PINNs is demonstrated by solving the following open-loop optimal control problems: (i) an analytical problem, (ii) a one-dimensional heat equation, and (iii) a two-dimensional predator-prey problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Coupled Multirate Infinitesimal GARK Schemes for Stiff Systems with Multiple Time Scales

Traditional time discretization methods use a single timestep for the entire system of interest and can perform poorly when the dynamics of the system exhibits a wide range of time scales. Multirate infinitesimal step (MIS) methods (Knoth and Wolke, 1998) offer an elegant and flexible approach to efficiently integrate such systems. The slow components are discretized by a Runge-Kutta method, and the fast components are resolved by solving modified fast differential equations. Sandu (2018) developed the Multirate Infinitesimal General-structure Additive Runge-Kutta (MRI-GARK) family of methods that includes traditional MIS schemes as a subset. The MRI-GARK framework allowed the construction of the first fourth order MIS schemes. This framework also enabled the introduction of implicit methods, which are decoupled in the sense that any implicitness lies entirely within the fast or slow integrations. It was shown by Sandu that the stability of decoupled implicit MRI-GARK methods has limitations when both the fast and slow components are stiff and interact strongly. This work extends the MRI-GARK framework by introducing coupled implicit methods to solve stiff multiscale systems. The coupled approach has the potential to considerably improve the overall stability of the scheme, at the price of requiring implicit stage calculations over the entire system. Two coupling strategies are considered. The first computes coupled Runge-Kutta stages before solving a single differential equation to refine the fast solution. The second alternates between computing coupled Runge-Kutta stages and solving fast differential equations. We derive order conditions and perform the stability analysis for both strategies. The new coupled methods offer improved stability compared to the decoupled MRI-GARK schemes. The theoretical properties of the new methods are validated with numerical experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Implicit multirate GARK methods

This work considers multirate generalized-structure additively partitioned Runge-Kutta (MrGARK) methods for solving stiff systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with multiple time scales. These methods treat different partitions of the system with different timesteps for a more targeted and efficient solution compared to monolithic single rate approaches. With implicit methods used across all partitions, methods must find a balance between stability and the cost of solving nonlinear equations for the stages. In order to characterize this important trade-off, we explore multirate coupling strategies, problems for assessing linear stability, and techniques to efficiently implement Newton iterations for stage equations. Unlike much of the existing multirate stability analysis which is limited in scope to particular methods, we present general statements on stability and describe fundamental limitations for certain types of multirate schemes. New implicit multirate methods up to fourth order are derived, and their accuracy and efficiency properties are verified with numerical tests.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parallel implicit-explicit general linear methods

High-order discretizations of partial differential equations (PDEs) necessitate high-order time integration schemes capable of handling both stiff and nonstiff operators in an efficient manner. Implicit-explicit (IMEX) integration based on general linear methods (GLMs) offers an attractive solution due to their high stage and method order, as well as excellent stability properties. The IMEX characteristic allows stiff terms to be treated implicitly and nonstiff terms to be efficiently integrated explicitly. This work develops two systematic approaches for the development of IMEX GLMs of arbitrary order with stages that can be solved in parallel. The first approach is based on diagonally implicit multistage integration methods (DIMSIMs) of types 3 and 4. The second is a parallel generalization of IMEX Euler and has the interesting feature that the linear stability is independent of the order of accuracy. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical rates of convergence and reveal that the new schemes are more efficient than serial IMEX GLMs and IMEX Runge-Kutta methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access