BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Aobo Yang

Aobo Yang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceComputation and LanguageInformation Retrievaleess.SYSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

A Smart Adaptively Reconfigurable DC Battery for Higher Efficiency of Electric Vehicle Drive Trains

This paper proposes a drive train topology with a dynamically reconfigurable dc battery, which breaks hard-wired batteries into smaller subunits. It can rapidly control the output voltage and even contribute to voltage shaping of the inverter. Based upon the rapid development of low-voltage transistors and modular circuit topologies in the recent years, the proposed technology uses recent 48 V power electronics to achieve higher-voltage output and reduce losses in electric vehicle (EV) drive trains. The fast switching capability and low loss of low-voltage field effect transistors (FET) allow sharing the modulation with the main drive inverter. As such, the slower insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) of the inverter can operate at ideal duty cycle and aggressively reduced switching, while the adaptive dc battery provides an adjustable voltage and all common-mode contributions at the dc link with lower loss. Up to 2/3 of the switching of the main inverter is avoided. At high drive speeds and thus large modulation indices, the proposed converter halves the total loss compared to using the inverter alone; at lower speeds and thus smaller modulation indices, the advantage is even more prominent because of the dynamically lowered dc-link voltage. Furthermore, it can substantially reduce the distortion, particularly at lower modulation indices, e.g., down to 1/2 compared to conventional space-vector modulation and even 1/3 for discontinuous pulse-width modulation with hard-wired battery. Other benefits include alleviated insulation stress for motor windings, active battery balancing, and eliminating the vulnerability of large hard-wired battery packs to weak cells. We demonstrate the proposed motor drive on a 3-kW setup with eight battery modules.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Comparative Explanations of Recommendations

As recommendation is essentially a comparative (or ranking) process, a good explanation should illustrate to users why an item is believed to be better than another, i.e., comparative explanations about the recommended items. Ideally, after reading the explanations, a user should reach the same ranking of items as the system's. Unfortunately, little research attention has yet been paid on such comparative explanations. In this work, we develop an extract-and-refine architecture to explain the relative comparisons among a set of ranked items from a recommender system. For each recommended item, we first extract one sentence from its associated reviews that best suits the desired comparison against a set of reference items. Then this extracted sentence is further articulated with respect to the target user through a generative model to better explain why the item is recommended. We design a new explanation quality metric based on BLEU to guide the end-to-end training of the extraction and refinement components, which avoids generation of generic content. Extensive offline evaluations on two large recommendation benchmark datasets and serious user studies against an array of state-of-the-art explainable recommendation algorithms demonstrate the necessity of comparative explanations and the effectiveness of our solution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Explanation as a Defense of Recommendation

Textual explanations have proved to help improve user satisfaction on machine-made recommendations. However, current mainstream solutions loosely connect the learning of explanation with the learning of recommendation: for example, they are often separately modeled as rating prediction and content generation tasks. In this work, we propose to strengthen their connection by enforcing the idea of sentiment alignment between a recommendation and its corresponding explanation. At training time, the two learning tasks are joined by a latent sentiment vector, which is encoded by the recommendation module and used to make word choices for explanation generation. At both training and inference time, the explanation module is required to generate explanation text that matches sentiment predicted by the recommendation module. Extensive experiments demonstrate our solution outperforms a rich set of baselines in both recommendation and explanation tasks, especially on the improved quality of its generated explanations. More importantly, our user studies confirm our generated explanations help users better recognize the differences between recommended items and understand why an item is recommended.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access