BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Anton Geraschenko

Anton Geraschenko appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.AGeess.IVMachine LearningQuantitative Methods

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

It's easy to fool yourself: Case studies on identifying bias and confounding in bio-medical datasets

Confounding variables are a well known source of nuisance in biomedical studies. They present an even greater challenge when we combine them with black-box machine learning techniques that operate on raw data. This work presents two case studies. In one, we discovered biases arising from systematic errors in the data generation process. In the other, we found a spurious source of signal unrelated to the prediction task at hand. In both cases, our prediction models performed well but under careful examination hidden confounders and biases were revealed. These are cautionary tales on the limits of using machine learning techniques on raw data from scientific experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A "bottom up" characterization of smooth Deligne-Mumford stacks

In casual discussion, a stack is often described as a variety (the coarse space) together with stabilizer groups attached to some of its subvarieties. However, this description does not uniquely specify the stack. Our main result shows that for a large class of stacks one typically encounters, this description does indeed characterize them. Moreover, we prove that each such stack can be described in terms of two simple procedures applied iteratively to its coarse space: canonical stack constructions and root stack constructions. More precisely, if $\mathcal X$ is a smooth separated tame Deligne-Mumford stack of finite type over a field $k$ with trivial generic stabilizer, it is completely determined by its coarse space $X$ and the ramification divisor (on $X$) of the coarse space morphism $π\colon \mathcal X \to X$. Therefore, to specify such a stack, it is enough to specify a variety and the orders of the stabilizers of codimension 1 points. The group structures, as well as the stabilizer groups of higher codimension points, are then determined.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Torus Quotients as Global Quotients by Finite Groups

This article is motivated by the following local-to-global question: is every variety with tame quotient singularities globally the quotient of a smooth variety by a finite group? We show that this question has a positive answer for all quasi-projective varieties which are expressible as a quotient of a smooth variety by a split torus (e.g. simplicial toric varieties). Although simplicial toric varieties are rarely toric quotients of smooth varieties by finite groups, we give an explicit procedure for constructing the quotient structure using toric techniques. This result follow from a characterization of varieties which are expressible as the quotient of a smooth variety by a split torus. As an additional application of this characterization, we show that a variety with abelian quotient singularities may fail to be a quotient of a smooth variety by a finite abelian group. Concretely, we show that $\mathbb{P}^2/A_5$ is not expressible as a quotient of a smooth variety by a finite abelian group.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Toric Stacks I: The Theory of Stacky Fans

The purpose of this paper and its sequel (Toric Stacks II) is to introduce and develop a theory of toric stacks which encompasses and extends the notions of toric stacks defined in [Laf02, BCS05, FMN10, Iwa09, Sat12, Tyo12], as well as classical toric varieties. In this paper, we define a \emph{toric stack} as a quotient of a toric variety by a subgroup of its torus (we also define a generically stacky version). Any toric stack arises from a combinatorial gadget called a \emph{stacky fan}. We develop a dictionary between the combinatorics of stacky fans and the geometry of toric stacks, stressing stacky phenomena such as canonical stacks and good moduli space morphisms. We also show that smooth toric stacks carry a moduli interpretation extending the usual moduli interpretations of $\mathbb{P}^n$ and $[\mathbb{A}^1/\mathbb{G}_m]$. Indeed, smooth toric stacks precisely solve moduli problems specified by (generalized) effective Cartier divisors with given linear relations and given intersection relations. Smooth toric stacks therefore form a natural closure to the class of moduli problems introduced for smooth toric varieties and smooth toric DM stacks in [Cox95] and [Per08], respectively. We include a plethora of examples to illustrate the general theory. We hope that this theory of toric stacks can serve as a companion to an introduction to stacks, in much the same way that toric varieties can serve as a companion to an introduction to schemes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Toric Stacks II: Intrinsic Characterization of Toric Stacks

The purpose of this paper and its prequel (Toric Stacks I) is to introduce and develop a theory of toric stacks which encompasses and extends the notions of toric stacks defined in [Laf02, BCS05, FMN10, Iwa09, Sat12, Tyo12], as well as classical toric varieties. While the focus of the prequel is on how to work with toric stacks, the focus of this paper is how to show a stack is toric. For toric varieties, a classical result says that any normal variety with an action of a dense open torus arises from a fan. In [FMN09, Theorem 7.24], it is shown that a smooth separated DM stack with an action of a dense open stacky torus arises from a stacky fan. In the same spirit, the main result of this paper is that any Artin stack with an action of a dense open torus arises from a stacky fan under reasonable hypotheses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access