Researcher profile

Anna M. Nobili

Anna M. Nobili contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Systematic errors in high-precision gravity measurements by light-pulse atom interferometry on the ground and in space

We focus on the fact that light-pulse atom interferometers measure the atoms' acceleration with only three data points per drop. As a result, the measured effect of the gravity gradient is systematically larger than the true one, an error linear with the gradient and quadratic in time almost unnoticed so far. We show how this error affects the absolute measurement of the gravitational acceleration $g$ as well as ground and space experiments with gradiometers based on atom interferometry such as those designed for space geodesy, the measurement of the universal constant of gravity and the detection of gravitational waves. When atom interferometers test the universality of free fall and the weak equivalence principle by dropping different isotopes of the same atom one laser interrogates both isotopes and the error reported here cancels out. With atom clouds of different species and two lasers of different frequencies the phase shifts measured by the interferometer differ by a large amount even in absence of violation. Systematic errors, including common mode accelerations coupled to the gravity gradient with the reported error, lead to hard concurrent requirements --on the ground and in space-- on several dimensionless parameters all of which must be smaller than the sought-for violation signal.

preprint2016arXiv

Do general relativistic effects limit experiments to test the universality of free fall and the weak equivalence principle?

The Universality of Free Fall and the Weak Equivalence Principle, which are at the basis of General Relativity, have been confirmed to 1 part in 10^13. Space experiments with macroscopic test masses of different composition orbiting the Earth inside a low altitude satellite aim at improving this precision by two orders of magnitude (with the Microscope satellite, launched on 25 April 2016) and up to four orders of magnitude (with the 'Galileo Galilei' - GG satellite). At such a high precision many tiny effects must be taken into account in order to be ruled out as the source of a spurious violation signal. In this work we investigate the general relativistic effects, including those which involve the rotation of both the source body and the test masses, and show that they are by far too small to be considered even in the most challenging experiment. (Paper to appear on Physical Review D)

preprint2016arXiv

Fundamental limitations to high-precision tests of the universality of free fall by dropping atoms

Tests of the universality of free fall and the weak equivalence principle probe the foundations of General Relativity. Evidence of a violation may lead to the discovery of a new force. The best torsion balance experiments have ruled it out to 10^-13. Cold-atom drop tests have reached 10^-7 and promise to do 7 to 10 orders of magnitude better, on the ground or in space. They are limited by the random shot noise, which depends on the number N of atoms in the clouds. As mass-dropping experiments in the non-uniform gravitational field of Earth, they are sensitive to the initial conditions. Random accelerations due to initial condition errors of the clouds are designed to be at the same level as shot noise, so that they can be reduced with the number of drops along with it. This sets the requirements for the initial position and velocity spreads of the clouds with given N. In the STE-QUEST space mission proposal aiming at 2x10^-15 they must be about a factor 8 above Heisenberg's principle limit, and the integration time required to reduce both errors is 3 years, with a mission duration of 5 years. Instead, offset errors at release between different atom clouds are systematic and give rise to a systematic effect which mimics a violation. Such offsets must be demonstrated to be as small as required in all drops, must be small by design and must be measured. For STE-QUEST to meet its goal they must be several orders of magnitude smaller than the size of each individual cloud, which in its turn must be at most 8 times larger than the uncertainty principle limit. Even if all technical problems are solved and the clouds are released with negligible systematic errors, still they must be measured. Then, Heisenberg's principle dictates that the measurement lasts as long as the experiment and the systematic nature of the effect requires many measurements for it to be ruled out as a source of violation.