Source author record

Angus Tavner

Angus Tavner appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Wall Stress Distributions in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Do Not Correlate With Symptoms

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a permanent and irreversible dilation of the lower region of the aorta. It is typically an asymptomatic condition that if left untreated can expand to the point of rupture. Mechanically-speaking, rupture of an artery occurs when the local wall stress exceeds the local wall strength. It is therefore understandable that numerous studies have attempted to estimate the AAA wall stress. Recently the Intelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory (ISML) presented a very efficient method to compute AAA wall stress using geometry from Computed Tomography (CT) images, and median arterial pressure as the applied load. The ISML's method is embedded in the software platform BioPARR - Biomechanics based Prediction of Aneurysm Rupture Risk, freely available from http://bioparr.mech.uwa.edu.au/. The uniqueness of our stress computation approach is three-fold: i) the results are insensitive to unknown patient-specific mechanical properties of arterial wall tissue; ii) the residual stress is accounted for, according to Y.C. Fung's Uniform Stress Hypothesis; and iii) the analysis is automated and quick, making our approach compatible with clinical workflows. In this study we evaluated 19 cases of AAA. A proportion of these were classified as symptomatic. The results of the analysis demonstrate, contrary to the common view, that neither the wall stress magnitude nor the stress distribution correlate with the presence of clinical symptoms.