Source author record

Andrius Ibenskas

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
1topics
2close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2014arXiv

Antiferromagnetic triangular Blume-Capel model with hard core exclusions

Using Monte Carlo simulation we analyze phase transitions of two antiferromagnetic (AFM) triangular Blume-Capel (BC) models with AFM interactions between third nearest neighbors. One model has hard core exclusions between the nearest neighbor (1NN) particles (3NN1 model) and the other - between 1NN and next-nearest-neighbor particles (3NN12 model). Finite-size scaling analysis reveals that in these models, as in the 1NN AFM BC model, the transition from paramagnetic to long-range order (LRO) AFM phase is either of the first-order or goes through intermediate phase which might be attributed to Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) type. We show that properties of the low-temperature phase transition to the AFM phase of 1NN, 3NN1 and 3NN12 models are very similar in all interval of a normalized single-ion anisotropy parameter, δδ, except where the first order phase transitions occur. Due to different entropy of the 3NN12 and 3NN1 models, their higher temperature behavior is different from that of the 1NN model. Three phase transitions are observed for 3NN12 model: (i) from paramagnetic phase to the phase with domains of the LRO AFM phase at TcT_c ; (ii) from this structure to diluted frustrated BKT-type phase at T2T_2 (high-temperature limit of the critical line of the BKT-type phase transitions) and (iii) from this frustrated phase to the AFM LRO phase at T1T_1 (low-temperature limit of this line). For the 3NN12 model Tc>T2>T1T_c>T_2>T_1 at 0<δ<1.150<δ<1.15 (range I), Tc=T2>T1T_c=T_2>T_1 at 1.15<δ<1.31.15<δ<1.3 (range II) and Tc=T2=T1T_c=T_2=T_1 at 1.3<δ<1.51.3<δ<1.5 (range III). For 3NN1 model Tc=T2>T1T_c=T_2>T_1 at 0<δ<1.20<δ<1.2 (range II) and Tc=T2=T1T_c=T_2=T_1 at 1.2<δ<1.51.2<δ<1.5 (range III). In range III there is only first order phase transition. In range II the transition at Tc=T2T_c=T_2 is of the first order, too. In range I the transition at TcT_c is either weak first-order or second-order phase transition.

preprint2014arXiv

Phase transition properties of Bell-Lavis model

Using Monte Carlo calculations we analyze the order and the universality class of phase transitions into a low density (honeycomb) phase of a triangular antiferromagnetic three-state Bell-Lavis model. The results are obtained in a whole interval of chemical potential μμ corresponding to the honeycomb phase. Our results demonstrate that the phase transitions might be attributed to the three-state Potts universality class for all μμ values except for the edges of the honeycomb phase existence. At the honeycomb phase and the low density gas phase boundary the transitions become of the first order. At another, honeycomb-to-frustrated phase boundary, we observe the approach to the crossover from the three-state Potts to the Ising model universality class. We also obtain the Schottky anomaly in the specific heat close to this edge. We show that the intermediate planar phase, found in a very similar antiferromagnetic triangular Blume-Capel model, does not occur in the Bell-Lavis model.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.