BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andrew Harrison

Andrew Harrison contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsBiological Physicsecon.GNphysics.soc-phPopulations and Evolutionq-fin.EC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Modeling Bike Share Station Activity: Effects of Nearby Businesses and Jobs on Trips to and from Stations

The purpose of this research is to identify correlates of bike station activity for Nice Ride Minnesota, a bike share system in Minneapolis - St. Paul Metropolitan Area in Minnesota. We obtained the number of trips to and from each of the 116 bike share stations operating in 2011 from Nice Ride Minnesota. Data for independent variables included in models come from a variety of sources; including the 2010 US Census, the Metropolitan Council, a regional planning agency, and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. We use log-linear and negative binomial regression models to evaluate the marginal effects of these factors on average daily station trips. Our models have high goodness of fit, and each of 13 independent variables is significant at the 10% level or higher. The number of trips at Nice Ride stations is associated with neighborhood socio demographics (i.e., age and race), proximity to the central business district, proximity to water, accessibility to trails, distance to other bike share stations, and measures of economic activity. Analysts can use these results to optimize bike share operations, locate new stations, and evaluate the potential of new bike share programs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The evolution of cooperation: an evolutionary advantage of individuals impedes the evolution of the population

Range expansion is a universal process in biological systems, and therefore plays a part in biological evolution. Using a quantitative individual-based method based on the stochastic process, we identify that enhancing the inherent self-proliferation advantage of cooperators relative to defectors is a more effective channel to promote the evolution of cooperation in range expansion than weakening the benefit acquisition of defectors from cooperators. With this self-proliferation advantage, cooperators can rapidly colonize virgin space and establish spatial segregation more readily, which acts like a protective shield to further promote the evolution of cooperation in return. We also show that lower cell density and migration rate have a positive effect on the competition of cooperators with defectors. Biological evolution is based on competition between individuals and should therefore favor selfish behaviors. However, we observe a counterintuitive phenomenon that the evolution of a population is impeded by the fitness-enhancing chemotactic movement of individuals. This highlights a conflict between the interests of the individual and the population. The short-sighted selfish behavior of individuals may not be that favored in the competition between populations. Such information provides important implications for the handling of cooperation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access