BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andrew Green

Andrew Green contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
q-fin.PRq-fin.RMq-fin.CPq-fin.GNastro-ph.COq-fin.MFastro-ph.GAastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SRq-fin.PM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
12works
0followers
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Dirac Processes and Default Risk

We introduce Dirac processes, using Dirac delta functions, for short-rate-type pricing of financial derivatives. Dirac processes add spikes to the existing building blocks of diffusions and jumps. Dirac processes are Generalized Processes, which have not been used directly before because the dollar value of non-Real numbers is meaningless. However, short-rate pricing is based on integrals so Dirac processes are natural. This integration directly implies that jumps are redundant whilst Dirac processes expand expressivity of short-rate approaches. Practically, we demonstrate that Dirac processes enable high implied volatility for CDS swaptions that has been otherwise problematic in hazard rate setups.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

MVA: Initial Margin Valuation Adjustment by Replication and Regression

Initial margin requirements are becoming an increasingly common feature of derivative markets. However, while the valuation of derivatives under collateralisation (Piterbarg 2010, Piterbarg2012), under counterparty risk with unsecured funding costs (FVA) (Burgard2011, Burgard2011, Burgard2013) and in the presence of regulatory capital (KVA) (Green2014) are established through valuation adjustments, hitherto initial margin has not been considered. This paper further extends the semi-replication framework of (Burgard2013a), itself later extended by (Green2014), to cover the cost of initial margin, leading to Margin Valuation Adjustment (MVA). Initial margin requirements are typically generated through the use of VAR or CVAR models. Given the form of MVA as an integral over the expected initial margin profile this would lead to excessive computational costs if a brute force calculation were to be used. Hence we also propose a computationally efficient approach to the calculation of MVA through the use of regression techniques, Longstaff-Schwartz Augmented Compression (LSAC).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Self-Financing Trading and the Ito-Doeblin Lemma

The objective of the note is to remind readers on how self-financing works in Quantitative Finance. The authors have observed continuing uncertainty on this issue which may be because it lies exactly at the intersection of stochastic calculus and finance. The concept of a self-financing trading strategy was originally, and carefully, introduced in (Harrison and Kreps 1979) and expanded very generally in (Harrison and Pliska 1981).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Warehousing Credit (CVA) Risk, Capital (KVA) and Tax (TVA) Consequences

Credit risk may be warehoused by choice, or because of limited hedging possibilities. Credit risk warehousing increases capital requirements and leaves open risk. Open risk must be priced in the physical measure, rather than the risk neutral measure, and implies profits and losses. Furthermore the rate of return on capital that shareholders require must be paid from profits. Profits are taxable and losses provide tax credits. Here we extend the semi-replication approach of Burgard and Kjaer (2013) and the capital formalism (KVA) of Green, Kenyon, and Dennis (2014) to cover credit risk warehousing and tax, formalized as double-semi-replication and TVA (Tax Valuation Adjustment) to enable quantification.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Efficient XVA Management: Pricing, Hedging, and Attribution using Trade-Level Regression and Global Conditioning

Banks must manage their trading books, not just value them. Pricing includes valuation adjustments collectively known as XVA (at least credit, funding, capital and tax), so management must also include XVA. In trading book management we focus on pricing, hedging, and allocation of prices or hedging costs to desks on an individual trade basis. We show how to combine three technical elements to radically simplify XVA management, both in terms of the calculations, and the implementation of the calculations. The three technical elements are: trade-level regression; analytic computation of sensitivities; and global conditioning. All three are required to obtain the radical efficiency gains and implementation simplification. Moreover, many of the calculations are inherently parallel and suitable for GPU implementation. The resulting methodology for XVA management is sufficiently general that we can cover pricing, first- and second-order sensitivities, and exact trade-level allocation of pricing and sensitivities within the same framework. Managing incremental changes to portfolios exactly is also radically simplified.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

KVA: Capital Valuation Adjustment

Credit (CVA), Debit (DVA) and Funding Valuation Adjustments (FVA) are now familiar valuation adjustments made to the value of a portfolio of derivatives to account for credit risks and funding costs. However, recent changes in the regulatory regime and the increases in regulatory capital requirements has led many banks to include the cost of capital in derivative pricing. This paper formalises the addition of cost of capital by extending the Burgard-Kjaer (2013) semi-replication approach to CVA and FVA to include an addition capital term, Capital Valuation Adjustment (KVA, i.e. Kapital Valuation Adjustment to distinguish from CVA.) The utilization of the capital for funding purposes is also considered. The use of the semi-replication approach means that the flexibility around the treatment of self-default is carried over into this analysis. The paper further considers the practical calculation of KVA with reference to the Basel II (BCBS-128) and Basel III (BCBS-189) capital regimes and their implementation via CRD IV. The paper also assesses how KVA may be hedged, given that any hedging transactions themselves lead to regulatory capital requirements and hence capital costs. Finally a number of numerical examples are presented to gauge the cost impact of KVA on vanilla derivative products.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Regulatory-Compliant Derivatives Pricing is Not Risk-Neutral

Regulations impose idiosyncratic capital and funding costs for holding derivatives. Capital requirements are costly because derivatives desks are risky businesses; funding is costly in part because regulations increase the minimum funding tenor. Idiosyncratic costs mean no single measure makes derivatives martingales for all market participants. Hence Regulatory-compliant pricing is not risk-neutral. This has implications for exit prices and mark-to-market.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

VAR and ES/CVAR Dependence on data cleaning and Data Models: Analysis and Resolution

Historical (Stressed-) Value-at-Risk ((S)VAR), and Expected Shortfall (ES), are widely used risk measures in regulatory capital and Initial Margin, i.e. funding, computations. However, whilst the definitions of VAR and ES are unambiguous, they depend on input distributions that are data-cleaning- and Data-Model-dependent. We quantify the scale of these effects from USD CDS (2004--2014), and from USD interest rates (1989--2014, single-curve setup before 2004, multi-curve setup after 2004), and make two standardisation proposals: for data; and for Data-Models. VAR and ES are required for lifetime portfolio calculations, i.e. collateral calls, which cover a wide range of market states. Hence we need standard, i.e. clean, complete, and common (i.e. identical for all banks), market data also covering this wide range of market states. This data is historically incomplete and not clean hence data standardization is required. Stressed VAR and ES require moving market movements during a past (usually not recent) window to current, and future, market states. All choices (e.g. absolute difference, relative, relative scaled by some function of market states) implicitly define a Data Model for transformation of extreme market moves (recall that 99th percentiles are typical, and the behaviour of the rest is irrelevant). Hence we propose standard Data Models. These are necessary because different banks have different stress windows. Where there is no data, or a requirement for simplicity, we propose standard lookup tables (one per window, etc.). Without this standardization of data and Data Models we demonstrate that VAR and ES are complex derivatives of subjective choices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Collateral-Enhanced Default Risk

Changes in collateralization have been implicated in significant default (or near-default) events during the financial crisis, most notably with AIG. We have developed a framework for quantifying this effect based on moving between Merton-type and Black-Cox-type structural default models. Our framework leads to a single equation that emcompasses the range of possibilities, including collateralization remargining frequency (i.e. discrete observations). We show that increases in collateralization, by exposing entities to daily mark-to-market volatility, enhance default probability. This quantifies the well-known problem with collateral triggers. Furthermore our model can be used to quantify the degree to which central counterparties, whilst removing credit risk transmission, systematically increase default risk.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

AAO Observer Number 122 (August 2012)

The newsletter of the Australian Astronomical Observatory. In this issue: SPIE Extravaganza; The AAO's Gemini High-resolution Optical SpecTrograph (GHOST) concept; First Cosmological Constraints from the 6dFGS Peculiar Velocity Field; Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): GAMA Announces Second Data Release; Evidence for Significant Growth in the Stellar Mass of the Most Massive Galaxies in the Universe; The 5th Southern Cross Conference: A Joint CASS/AAO Conference; GALAH: Preparing for Flight; and all the usual columns and news from the Observatory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Tully-Fisher Relation for 25,000 SDSS Galaxies as Function of Environment

We construct Tully-Fisher relationships (TFRs) in the $u$, $g$, $r$, $i$ and $z$ bands and stellar mass TFRs (smTFRs) for a sample of $25,698$ late spiral type galaxies (with $0.045<z<0.085$) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and study the effects of environment on the relation. We use SDSS-measured Balmer emission line widths, $v_{\rm FWHM}$, as a proxy for disc circular velocity, $v_{\rm circ}$. A priori it is not clear whether we can construct accurate TFRs given the small $3&#34;$ diameter of the fibres used for SDSS spectroscopic measurements. However, we show by modelling the H$α$ emission profile as observed through a $3&#34;$ aperture that for galaxies at appropriate redshifts ($z>0.045$) the fibres sample enough of the disc to obtain a linear relationship between $v_{\rm FWHM}$ and $v_{\rm circ}$, allowing us to obtain a TFR and to investigate dependence on other variables. We also develop a methodology for distinguishing between astrophysical and sample bias in the fibre TFR trends. We observe the well-known steepening of the TFR in redder bands in our sample. We divide the sample of galaxies into four equal groups using projected neighbour density ($Σ$) quartiles and find no significant dependence on environment, extending previous work to a wider range of environments and a much larger sample. Having demonstrated that we can construct SDSS-based TFRs is very useful for future applications because of the large sample size available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Will Central Counterparties become the New Rating Agencies?

Central Counterparties (CCPs) are widely promoted as a requirement for safe banking with little dissent except on technical grounds (such as proliferation of CCPs). Whilst CCPs can have major operational positives, we argue that CCPs have many of the business characteristics of Rating Agencies, and face similar business pressures. Thus we see a risk that prices from CCPs may develop the characteristics attributed to ratings from Rating Agency pre-crisis. Business over-reliance on ratings of questionable accuracy is seen as a cause of the financial crisis. We see the potential for same situation to be repeated with prices from CCPs. Thus the regulatory emphasis on CCPs, rather than on collateralization, may create the preconditions for an avoidable repeat of the financial crisis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access