Source author record

Andreas Wahle

Andreas Wahle appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Reproducibility of Retinal Thickness Measurements across Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Devices using Iowa Reference Algorithm

PURPOSE: Establishing and obtaining consistent quantitative indices of retinal thickness from a variety of clinically used Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography scanners. DESIGN: Retinal images from five Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography scanners were used to determine total retinal thickness with scanner-specific correction factors establishing consistency of thickness measurement across devices. PARTICIPANTS: 55 Fovea-centered Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography volumes from eleven subjects were analyzed, obtained from Cirrus HD-OCT, RS-3000, Heidelberg Spectralis, RTVue and Topcon2000, seven subjects with retinal diseases and four normal controls. METHOD: The Iowa Reference Algorithm measured total retinal thickness. Nonlinear model of total retinal thickness measurement comparisons was derived and used for device-specific comparisons. Bland-Altman plots and pairwise predictive equations yielded pairwise scanner-specific differences. Mendel test determined whether measurement biases were constant for each scanner pair. RESULTS: Mendel test revealed that all pairwise scanner differences of total retinal thickness were constant across the cohort (p=0.992). Individual measurements can thus be bias-corrected and the Iowa Reference Algorithm serve as a scanner-agnostic independent standard of total retinal thickness across the five tested SD-OCT scanners. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of the Iowa Reference Algorithm with scanner-specific bias correction yields cross-scanner consistency of total retinal thickness measurements, facilitating scanning-device independent quantitative assessment of total retinal thickness, longitudinal follow-up quantification without requiring patients to be imaged on the same scanner model, and allowing for multi-center studies with heterogeneous device utilization when using the Iowa Reference Algorithm.