Researcher profile

Andrè Martin

Andrè Martin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

PCRAFT: Capacity Planning for Dependable Stateless Services

Fault-tolerance techniques depend on replication to enhance availability, albeit at the cost of increased infrastructure costs. This results in a fundamental trade-off: Fault-tolerant services must satisfy given availability and performance constraints while minimising the number of replicated resources. These constraints pose capacity planning challenges for the service operators to minimise replication costs without negatively impacting availability. To this end, we present PCRAFT, a system to enable capacity planning of dependable services. PCRAFT's capacity planning is based on a hybrid approach that combines empirical performance measurements with probabilistic modelling of availability based on fault injection. In particular, we integrate traditional service-level availability mechanisms (active route anywhere and passive failover) and deployment schemes (cloud and on-premises) to quantify the number of nodes needed to satisfy the given availability and performance constraints. Our evaluation based on real-world applications shows that cloud deployment requires fewer nodes than on-premises deployments. Additionally, when considering on-premises deployments, we show how passive failover requires fewer nodes than active route anywhere. Furthermore, our evaluation quantify the quality enhancement given by additional integrity mechanisms and how this affects the number of nodes needed.