BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Ana Silva contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
In this paper, we prove that the MaxCut problem is NP-complete on permutation graphs, settling a long-standing open problem that appeared in the 1985 column of the "Ongoing Guide to NP-completeness" by David S. Johnson.
A temporal graph ${\cal G}$ is a graph that changes with time. More specifically, it is a pair $(G, λ)$ where $G$ is a graph and $λ$ is a function on the edges of $G$ that describes when each edge $e\in E(G)$ is active. Given vertices $s,t\in V(G)$, a temporal $s,t$-path is a path in $G$ that traverses edges in non-decreasing time; and if $s,t$ are non-adjacent, then a temporal $s,t$-cut is a subset $S\subseteq V(G)\setminus\{s,t\}$ whose removal destroys all temporal $s,t$-paths. It is known that Menger's Theorem does not hold on this context, i.e., that the maximum number of internally vertex disjoint temporal $s,t$-paths is not necessarily equal to the minimum size of a temporal $s,t$-cut. In a seminal paper, Kempe, Kleinberg and Kumar (STOC'2000) defined a graph $G$ to be Mengerian if equality holds on $(G,λ)$ for every function $λ$. They then proved that, if each edge is allowed to be active only once in $(G,λ)$, then $G$ is Mengerian if and only if $G$ has no gem as topological minor. In this paper, we generalize their result by allowing edges to be active more than once, giving a characterization also in terms of forbidden structures. We additionally provide a polynomial time recognition algorithm.
Given a graph $G$ and a digraph $D$ whose vertices are the edges of $G$, we investigate the problem of finding a spanning tree of $G$ that satisfies the constraints imposed by $D$. The restrictions to add an edge in the tree depend on its neighborhood in $D$. Here, we generalize previously investigated problems by also considering as input functions $\ell$ and $u$ on $E(G)$ that give a lower and an upper bound, respectively, on the number of constraints that must be satisfied by each edge. The produced feasibility problem is denoted by \texttt{G-DCST}, while the optimization problem is denoted by \texttt{G-DCMST}. We show that \texttt{G-DCST} is NP-complete even under strong assumptions on the structures of $G$ and $D$, as well as on functions $\ell$ and $u$. On the positive side, we prove two polynomial results, one for \texttt{G-DCST} and another for \texttt{G-DCMST}, and also give a simple exponential-time algorithm along with a proof that it is asymptotically optimal under the Ð. Finally, we prove that other previously studied constrained spanning tree (\textsc{CST}) problems can be modeled within our framework, namely, the \textsc{Conflict CST}, the \textsc{Forcing CS, the \textsc{At Least One/All Dependency CST}, the \textsc{Maximum Degree CST}, the \textsc{Minimum Degree CST}, and the \textsc{Fixed-Leaves Minimum Degree CST}.
A temporal digraph ${\cal G}$ is a triple $(G, γ, λ)$ where $G$ is a digraph, $γ$ is a function on $V(G)$ that tells us the timestamps when a vertex is active, and $λ$ is a function on $E(G)$ that tells for each $uv \in E(G)$ when $u$ and $v$ are linked. Given a static digraph $G$, and a subset $R\subseteq V(G)$, a spanning branching with root $R$ is a subdigraph of $G$ that has exactly one path from $R$ to each $v\in V(G)$. In this paper, we consider the temporal version of Edmonds' classical result about the problem of finding $k$ edge-disjoint spanning branchings respectively rooted at given $R_1,\cdots,R_k$. We introduce and investigate different definitions of spanning branchings, and of edge-disjointness in the context of temporal graphs. A branching ${\cal B}$ is vertex-spanning if the root is able to reach each vertex $v$ of $G$ at some time where $v$ is active, while it is temporal-spanning if $v$ can be reached from the root at every time where $v$ is active. On the other hand, two branchings ${\cal B}_1$ and ${\cal B}_2$ are edge-disjoint if they do not use the same edge of $G$, and are temporal-edge-disjoint if they can use the same edge of $G$ but at different times. This lead us to four definitions of disjoint spanning branchings and we prove that, unlike the static case, only one of these can be computed in polynomial time, namely the temporal-edge-disjoint temporal-spanning branchings problem, while the other versions are $\mathsf{NP}$-complete, even under very strict assumptions.