Researcher profile

An-phi Nguyen

An-phi Nguyen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Learning Invariances for Interpretability using Supervised VAE

We propose to learn model invariances as a means of interpreting a model. This is motivated by a reverse engineering principle. If we understand a problem, we may introduce inductive biases in our model in the form of invariances. Conversely, when interpreting a complex supervised model, we can study its invariances to understand how that model solves a problem. To this end we propose a supervised form of variational auto-encoders (VAEs). Crucially, only a subset of the dimensions in the latent space contributes to the supervised task, allowing the remaining dimensions to act as nuisance parameters. By sampling solely the nuisance dimensions, we are able to generate samples that have undergone transformations that leave the classification unchanged, revealing the invariances of the model. Our experimental results show the capability of our proposed model both in terms of classification, and generation of invariantly transformed samples. Finally we show how combining our model with feature attribution methods it is possible to reach a more fine-grained understanding about the decision process of the model.

preprint2020arXiv

On quantitative aspects of model interpretability

Despite the growing body of work in interpretable machine learning, it remains unclear how to evaluate different explainability methods without resorting to qualitative assessment and user-studies. While interpretability is an inherently subjective matter, previous works in cognitive science and epistemology have shown that good explanations do possess aspects that can be objectively judged apart from fidelity), such assimplicity and broadness. In this paper we propose a set of metrics to programmatically evaluate interpretability methods along these dimensions. In particular, we argue that the performance of methods along these dimensions can be orthogonally imputed to two conceptual parts, namely the feature extractor and the actual explainability method. We experimentally validate our metrics on different benchmark tasks and show how they can be used to guide a practitioner in the selection of the most appropriate method for the task at hand.