Source author record

An-phi Nguyen

An-phi Nguyen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Learning Invariances for Interpretability using Supervised VAE

We propose to learn model invariances as a means of interpreting a model. This is motivated by a reverse engineering principle. If we understand a problem, we may introduce inductive biases in our model in the form of invariances. Conversely, when interpreting a complex supervised model, we can study its invariances to understand how that model solves a problem. To this end we propose a supervised form of variational auto-encoders (VAEs). Crucially, only a subset of the dimensions in the latent space contributes to the supervised task, allowing the remaining dimensions to act as nuisance parameters. By sampling solely the nuisance dimensions, we are able to generate samples that have undergone transformations that leave the classification unchanged, revealing the invariances of the model. Our experimental results show the capability of our proposed model both in terms of classification, and generation of invariantly transformed samples. Finally we show how combining our model with feature attribution methods it is possible to reach a more fine-grained understanding about the decision process of the model.

preprint2020arXiv

On quantitative aspects of model interpretability

Despite the growing body of work in interpretable machine learning, it remains unclear how to evaluate different explainability methods without resorting to qualitative assessment and user-studies. While interpretability is an inherently subjective matter, previous works in cognitive science and epistemology have shown that good explanations do possess aspects that can be objectively judged apart from fidelity), such assimplicity and broadness. In this paper we propose a set of metrics to programmatically evaluate interpretability methods along these dimensions. In particular, we argue that the performance of methods along these dimensions can be orthogonally imputed to two conceptual parts, namely the feature extractor and the actual explainability method. We experimentally validate our metrics on different benchmark tasks and show how they can be used to guide a practitioner in the selection of the most appropriate method for the task at hand.