Researcher profile

Amirhossein Nazerian

Amirhossein Nazerian contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

The Frequency Response of Networks as Open Systems

Many biological, technological, and social systems can be effectively described as networks of interacting subsystems. Typically, these networks are not isolated objects, but interact with their environment through both signals and information that is received by specific nodes with an input function or released to the environment by other nodes with an output function. An important question is whether the structure of different networks, together with the particular selection of input and output nodes, is such that it favors the passing or blocking of such signals. For a given network and a given choice of the input and output nodes, the H2-norm provides a natural and general quantification of the extent to which input signals, whether deterministic or stochastic, periodic or arbitrary, are amplified. We analyze a diverse set of empirical networks and find that many naturally occurring systems, such as food webs, signaling pathways, and gene regulatory circuits, are structurally organized to enhance the passing of signals; in contrast, the structure of engineered systems like power grids appears to be intentionally designed to suppress signal propagation.

preprint2022arXiv

Matryoshka and Disjoint Cluster Synchronization of Networks

The main motivation for this paper is to present a definition of network synchronizability for the case of cluster synchronization (CS), in an analogous fashion to Barahona and Pecora for the case of complete synchronization. We find this problem to be substantially more complex than the original one. We distinguish between the two cases of networks with intertwined clusters and no intertwined clusters and between {the two cases that the master stability function is negative either in a bounded range or in an unbounded range of its argument. We first obtain a definition of synchronizability that applies to each individual cluster within a network and then attempt to generalize this definition to the entire network. For CS, the synchronous solution of each cluster may be stable independent of the stability of the other clusters, which results in possibly different ranges in which each cluster synchronizes (isolated CS.) For each pair of clusters, we distinguish between three different cases: Matryoshka Cluster Synchronization (when the range of the stability of the synchronous solution for one cluster is included in that of the other cluster), Partially Disjoint Cluster Synchronization (when the ranges of stability of the synchronous solutions partially overlap), and Complete Disjoint Cluster Synchronization (when the ranges of stability of the synchronous solutions do not overlap.)