Source author record

Amir Ajorlou

Amir Ajorlou appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computer Science and Game Theory math.OC Social and Information Networks Systems and Control math.DS Multiagent Systems physics.soc-ph Robotics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

8topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Digraphs with Distinguishable Dynamics under the Multi-Agent Agreement Protocol

In this work, the ability to distinguish digraphs from the output response of some observing agents in a multi-agent network under the agreement protocol has been studied. Given a fixed observation point, it is desired to find sufficient graphical conditions under which the failure of a set of edges in the network information flow digraph is distinguishable from another set. When the latter is empty, this corresponds to the detectability of the former link set given the response of the observing agent. In developing the results, a powerful extension of the all-minors matrix tree theorem in algebraic graph theory is proved which relates the minors of the transformed Laplacian of a directed graph to the number and length of the shortest paths between its vertices. The results reveal an intricate relationship between the ability to distinguish the responses of a healthy and a faulty multi-agent network and the inter-nodal paths in their information flow digraphs. The results have direct implications for the operation and design of multi-agent systems subject to multiple link losses. Simulations and examples are presented to illustrate the analytic findings.

preprint2015arXiv

Competitive Diffusion in Social Networks: Quality or Seeding?

In this paper, we study a strategic model of marketing and product consumption in social networks. We consider two firms in a market competing to maximize the consumption of their products. Firms have a limited budget which can be either invested on the quality of the product or spent on initial seeding in the network in order to better facilitate spread of the product. After the decision of firms, agents choose their consumptions following a myopic best response dynamics which results in a local, linear update for their consumption decision. We characterize the unique Nash equilibrium of the game between firms and study the effect of the budgets as well as the network structure on the optimal allocation. We show that at the equilibrium, firms invest more budget on quality when their budgets are close to each other. However, as the gap between budgets widens, competition in qualities becomes less effective and firms spend more of their budget on seeding. We also show that given equal budget of firms, if seeding budget is nonzero for a balanced graph, it will also be nonzero for any other graph, and if seeding budget is zero for a star graph it will be zero for any other graph as well. As a practical extension, we then consider a case where products have some preset qualities that can be only improved marginally. At some point in time, firms learn about the network structure and decide to utilize a limited budget to mount their market share by either improving the quality or new seeding some agents to incline consumers towards their products. We show that the optimal budget allocation in this case simplifies to a threshold strategy. Interestingly, we derive similar results to that of the original problem, in which preset qualities simulate the role that budgets had in the original setup.

preprint2014arXiv

Optimal Budget Allocation in Social Networks: Quality or Seeding

In this paper, we study a strategic model of marketing and product consumption in social networks. We consider two competing firms in a market providing two substitutable products with preset qualities. Agents choose their consumptions following a myopic best response dynamics which results in a local, linear update for the consumptions. At some point in time, firms receive a limited budget which they can use to trigger a larger consumption of their products in the network. Firms have to decide between marginally improving the quality of their products and giving free offers to a chosen set of agents in the network in order to better facilitate spreading their products. We derive a simple threshold rule for the optimal allocation of the budget and describe the resulting Nash equilibrium. It is shown that the optimal allocation of the budget depends on the entire distribution of centralities in the network, quality of products and the model parameters. In particular, we show that in a graph with a higher number of agents with centralities above a certain threshold, firms spend more budget on seeding in the optimal allocation. Furthermore, if seeding budget is nonzero for a balanced graph, it will also be nonzero for any other graph, and if seeding budget is zero for a star graph, it will be zero for any other graph too. We also show that firms allocate more budget to quality improvement when their qualities are close, in order to distance themselves from the rival firm. However, as the gap between qualities widens, competition in qualities becomes less effective and firms spend more budget on seeding.