BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alin Razvan Paraschiv

Alin Razvan Paraschiv contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.SRastro-ph.IMMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Efficient and Automated Inversions of Magnetically-Sensitive Forbidden Coronal Lines: CLEDB -- The Coronal Line Emission DataBase Magnetic Field Inversion Algorithm

We present CLEDB, a "single point inversion" algorithm for inferring magnetic parameters using I,Q,U, and V Stokes parameters of forbidden magnetic dipole lines formed in the solar corona. We select lines of interest and construct databases of Stokes parameters for combinations of plasma thermal and magnetic configurations. The size and complexity of such databases are drastically reduced by taking advantage of symmetries. Using wavelength-integrated line profiles, each of which might be decomposed beforehand into several line-of-sight components, we search for nearest matches to observed Stokes parameters computed for the elongation corresponding to the observed region. The method is intended to be applied to two or more lines observed simultaneously. The solutions initially yield magnetic orientation, thermal properties, and the spatial position of the emitting plasma in three dimensions. Multiple possible solutions for each observation are returned, including irreducible degeneracies, where usually sets of two solutions are compatible with the two input I,Q,U, and V measurements. In solving for the scattering geometry, this method avoids an additional degeneracy pointed out by Dima & Schad (2020). The magnetic field strength is separately derived from the simple ratio of observed to database Stokes V data, after the thermal properties and scattering geometry solutions have been determined.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Predicting the Geoeffectiveness of CMEs Using Machine Learning

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are the most geoeffective space weather phenomena, being associated with large geomagnetic storms, having the potential to cause disturbances to telecommunication, satellite network disruptions, power grid damages and failures. Thus, considering these storms' potential effects on human activities, accurate forecasts of the geoeffectiveness of CMEs are paramount. This work focuses on experimenting with different machine learning methods trained on white-light coronagraph datasets of close to sun CMEs, to estimate whether such a newly erupting ejection has the potential to induce geomagnetic activity. We developed binary classification models using logistic regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, feed forward artificial neural networks, as well as ensemble models. At this time, we limited our forecast to exclusively use solar onset parameters, to ensure extended warning times. We discuss the main challenges of this task, namely the extreme imbalance between the number of geoeffective and ineffective events in our dataset, along with their numerous similarities and the limited number of available variables. We show that even in such conditions, adequate hit rates can be achieved with these models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Trigger Mechanism of Recurrent Solar Active Region Jets Revealed by the Magnetic Properties of a Coronal Geyser Site

Solar active region jets are small-scale collimated plasma eruptions that are triggered from magnetic sites embedded in sunspot penumbral regions. Multiple trigger mechanisms for recurrent jets are under debate. Vector magnetic field data from SDO-HMI observations are used to analyze a prolific photospheric configuration, identified in extreme ultraviolet observations as a `Coronal Geyser', that triggered a set of at least 10 recurrent solar active region jets. We focus on interpreting the magnetic fields of small-scale flaring sites aiming to understand the processes that govern recurrent jet eruptions. We perform a custom reprocessing of the SDO-HMI products, including disambiguation and uncertainty estimation. We scrutinized the configuration and dynamics of the photospheric magnetic structures. The magnetic configuration is described via the analysis of the photospheric magnetic vertical fields, to identify the process is responsible for driving the jet eruptions. We report that the two widely debated magnetic trigger processes, namely magnetic flux cancellation and magnetic flux emergence, appear to be responsible on a case by case basis for generating each eruption in our set. We find that 4 of 10 jets were due to flux cancellation while the rest were clearly not, and were more likely due to flux emergence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access