Source author record

Alexander Nwala

Alexander Nwala appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Manipulating Twitter Through Deletions

Research into influence campaigns on Twitter has mostly relied on identifying malicious activities from tweets obtained via public APIs. These APIs provide access to public tweets that have not been deleted. However, bad actors can delete content strategically to manipulate the system. Unfortunately, estimates based on publicly available Twitter data underestimate the true deletion volume. Here, we provide the first exhaustive, large-scale analysis of anomalous deletion patterns involving more than a billion deletions by over 11 million accounts. We find that a small fraction of accounts delete a large number of tweets daily. We also uncover two abusive behaviors that exploit deletions. First, limits on tweet volume are circumvented, allowing certain accounts to flood the network with over 26 thousand daily tweets. Second, coordinated networks of accounts engage in repetitive likes and unlikes of content that is eventually deleted, which can manipulate ranking algorithms. These kinds of abuse can be exploited to amplify content and inflate popularity, while evading detection. Our study provides platforms and researchers with new methods for identifying social media abuse.

preprint2018arXiv

The Many Shapes of Archive-It

Web archives, a key area of digital preservation, meet the needs of journalists, social scientists, historians, and government organizations. The use cases for these groups often require that they guide the archiving process themselves, selecting their own original resources, or seeds, and creating their own web archive collections. We focus on the collections within Archive-It, a subscription service started by the Internet Archive in 2005 for the purpose of allowing organizations to create their own collections of archived web pages, or mementos. Understanding these collections could be done via their user-supplied metadata or via text analysis, but the metadata is applied inconsistently between collections and some Archive-It collections consist of hundreds of thousands of seeds, making it costly in terms of time to download each memento. Our work proposes using structural metadata as an additional way to understand these collections. We explore structural features currently existing in these collections that can unveil curation and crawling behaviors. We adapt the concept of the collection growth curve for understanding Archive-It collection curation and crawling behavior. We also introduce several seed features and come to an understanding of the diversity of resources that make up a collection. Finally, we use the descriptions of each collection to identify four semantic categories of Archive-It collections. Using the identified structural features, we reviewed the results of runs with 20 classifiers and are able to predict the semantic category of a collection using a Random Forest classifier with a weighted average F1 score of 0.720, thus bridging the structural to the descriptive. Our method is useful because it saves the researcher time and bandwidth. Identifying collections by their semantic category allows further downstream processing to be tailored to these categories.

preprint2016arXiv

A Supervised Learning Algorithm for Binary Domain Classification of Web Queries using SERPs

General purpose Search Engines (SEs) crawl all domains (e.g., Sports, News, Entertainment) of the Web, but sometimes the informational need of a query is restricted to a particular domain (e.g., Medical). We leverage the work of SEs as part of our effort to route domain specific queries to local Digital Libraries (DLs). SEs are often used even if they are not the "best" source for certain types of queries. Rather than tell users to "use this DL for this kind of query", we intend to automatically detect when a query could be better served by a local DL (such as a private, access-controlled DL that is not crawlable via SEs). This is not an easy task because Web queries are short, ambiguous, and there is lack of quality labeled training data (or it is expensive to create). To detect queries that should be routed to local, specialized DLs, we first send the queries to Google and then examine the features in the resulting Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs), and then classify the query as belonging to either the scholar or non-scholar domain. Using 400,000 AOL queries for the non-scholar domain and 400,000 queries from the NASA Technical Report Server (NTRS) for the scholar domain, our classifier achieved a precision of 0.809 and F-measure of 0.805.